Enhancing Risk Communication: Interactive and Web‐Hosted Tools for Visualising Quantitative Risk and Reliability

Abstract Conveying risk and reliability metrics to non‐experts is hard because probabilities and expected monetary losses often lie far outside everyday intuition. This paper looks at interactive web‐hosted tools as a means to alleviate this problem by comparing three existing tools to distil design guidance: a digital handbook for reliability predictions in space applications, a cloud inspection‐planning app for deteriorating structures, and a municipal fire‐risk platform. Each tool is evaluated against six recurrent themes: visualisation, interactivity, accessibility, maintainability, gamification, personalisation. Findings show that rich graphics plus direct parameter control are the entry ticket for engagement, while responsive web delivery and automated versioning keep analyses current and traceable. Light gamified cues (progress bars) and context‐aware content (local response times) further motivate users but must be applied sparingly to preserve credibility and privacy. We outline an evolutionary path from searchable digital handbooks through parameter‐driven calculators to map‐centred dashboards and demonstrate that well‐crafted interactivity transforms static risk reports into exploratory tools that enable genuinely risk‐informed decisions across diverse engineering domains.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ce/papers
Published
2025-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/cepa.3335
Primary Topic
Educational Games and Gamification
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Enhancing Risk Communication: Interactive and Web‐Hosted Tools for Visualising Quantitative Risk and Reliability

Matthias Schubert, Paul‐Remo Wagner
ce/papers
Educational Games and Gamification
article

Enhancing Risk Communication: Interactive and Web‐Hosted Tools for Visualising Quantitative Risk and Reliability

Matthias Schubert, Paul‐Remo Wagner
article en

Abstract

Abstract Conveying risk and reliability metrics to non‐experts is hard because probabilities and expected monetary losses often lie far outside everyday intuition. This paper looks at interactive web‐hosted tools as a means to alleviate this problem by comparing three existing tools to distil design guidance: a digital handbook for reliability predictions in space applications, a cloud inspection‐planning app for deteriorating structures, and a municipal fire‐risk platform. Each tool is evaluated against six recurrent themes: visualisation, interactivity, accessibility, maintainability, gamification, personalisation. Findings show that rich graphics plus direct parameter control are the entry ticket for engagement, while responsive web delivery and automated versioning keep analyses current and traceable. Light gamified cues (progress bars) and context‐aware content (local response times) further motivate users but must be applied sparingly to preserve credibility and privacy. We outline an evolutionary path from searchable digital handbooks through parameter‐driven calculators to map‐centred dashboards and demonstrate that well‐crafted interactivity transforms static risk reports into exploratory tools that enable genuinely risk‐informed decisions across diverse engineering domains.

ce/papersVol. 8(3-4)
Swiss National Museum (CH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Educational Games and Gamification
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.