A Risk‐Based Model for Optimizing the Construction Method Mix under Enterprise Risk Management

Abstract This paper proposes a quantitative framework for optimizing the construction method mix between onsite and offsite (prefabrication) construction under an Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) framework. Based on expert interviews, the study models loss events using Poisson (frequency) and Pareto (severity) distributions for each method's risk factors. Monte Carlo simulations are employed to compute risk indices, which are then used to define an optimal construction mix aligned with management's risk tolerance and aversion. A penalty function, derived from management input, ensures practical allocations by penalizing excessive deviations from the existing mix. The model identifies a 54% Onsite allocation as optimal under defined constraints. This approach offers a systematic, risk‐aligned method for strategic construction planning.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ce/papers
Published
2025-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/cepa.3344
Primary Topic
BIM and Construction Integration
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Risk‐Based Model for Optimizing the Construction Method Mix under Enterprise Risk Management

Panagiotis Spyridis, Konstantinos Tsermenidis
1 links
ce/papers
BIM and Construction Integration
article

A Risk‐Based Model for Optimizing the Construction Method Mix under Enterprise Risk Management

Panagiotis Spyridis, Konstantinos Tsermenidis
article en

Abstract

Abstract This paper proposes a quantitative framework for optimizing the construction method mix between onsite and offsite (prefabrication) construction under an Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) framework. Based on expert interviews, the study models loss events using Poisson (frequency) and Pareto (severity) distributions for each method's risk factors. Monte Carlo simulations are employed to compute risk indices, which are then used to define an optimal construction mix aligned with management's risk tolerance and aversion. A penalty function, derived from management input, ensures practical allocations by penalizing excessive deviations from the existing mix. The model identifies a 54% Onsite allocation as optimal under defined constraints. This approach offers a systematic, risk‐aligned method for strategic construction planning.

ce/papersVol. 8(3-4)
National Technical University of Athens (GR), University of Rostock (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
BIM and Construction Integration
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.