Quantifying Riverine Plastic Pollution Using Participatory Science and Trash Traps

Abstract Local governments and environmental nonprofits are increasingly using trash traps to intercept and remove escaped plastics and other litter from stormwater systems and surface waters. In this paper, we demonstrate the utility of these devices for collecting data that provide insights into riverine litter sources and solutions. Between 2021 and 2024, seven Waterkeeper organizations in North Carolina maintained 21 in‐stream trash traps in watersheds across the state and trained staff and volunteers to record the types and quantities of litter during cleanouts. Over this period, Waterkeeper organizations and their volunteers documented 150,750 pieces of litter captured by traps. Captured litter overwhelmingly comprised plastic that floats and is resistant to biodegradation. Litter accumulation rates were moderately positively correlated with the percentages of developed land and impervious surface as well as road and ambient population density in the associated watershed. In some traps, litter accumulation rates were also positively correlated with precipitation rates. Beyond understanding riverine plastic pollution, this paper also provides insights on challenges and opportunities that arise from using trash traps to collect data on riverine litter.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Community Science
Published
2025-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1029/2024csj000122
Primary Topic
Microplastics and Plastic Pollution
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Quantifying Riverine Plastic Pollution Using Participatory Science and Trash Traps

Elizabeth S. Kaufman, Emma Stewart, Riley Lewis, Jason A. Somarelli et al.
Community Science
Microplastics and Plastic Pollution
article

Quantifying Riverine Plastic Pollution Using Participatory Science and Trash Traps

Elizabeth S. Kaufman, Emma Stewart, Riley Lewis, Jason A. Somarelli, Nancy E. Lauer, Mary Haley, David J. Caldwell, Lisa G. Rider, Michelle Nowlin, Edgar R. Miller, Emily Fritz, Brandon Jones, S. A. Stephens, E. C. Sutton, Robert C. Clark, Taylor Register, Samantha Krop, Louisa Pitney, Hannah Woodburn, Emma Crider, Kaity D’Angelo, Cecilia Kammire
article en

Abstract

Abstract Local governments and environmental nonprofits are increasingly using trash traps to intercept and remove escaped plastics and other litter from stormwater systems and surface waters. In this paper, we demonstrate the utility of these devices for collecting data that provide insights into riverine litter sources and solutions. Between 2021 and 2024, seven Waterkeeper organizations in North Carolina maintained 21 in‐stream trash traps in watersheds across the state and trained staff and volunteers to record the types and quantities of litter during cleanouts. Over this period, Waterkeeper organizations and their volunteers documented 150,750 pieces of litter captured by traps. Captured litter overwhelmingly comprised plastic that floats and is resistant to biodegradation. Litter accumulation rates were moderately positively correlated with the percentages of developed land and impervious surface as well as road and ambient population density in the associated watershed. In some traps, litter accumulation rates were also positively correlated with precipitation rates. Beyond understanding riverine plastic pollution, this paper also provides insights on challenges and opportunities that arise from using trash traps to collect data on riverine litter.

Community ScienceVol. 4(3)
Duke University (US), Carteret Community College (US), Cape Fear Community College (US), Instituto de Montañas (US), Sound Rivers (US), Riverkeeper (US), Southern Regional Area Health Education Centers (US), National Assembly (KR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
Microplastics and Plastic Pollution
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.