Art Collections and Private International Law – The Case of the Esterházy Treasures

In the Esterházy case, the plaintiff requested that Hungarian courts establish its ownership over cultural goods located in Hungary that had been part of the collection of the Fraknó castle of the aristocratic family through the centuries. History – through the removal of the goods from the castle; their nationalization; and the change of state borders – had an imprint on the legal status of the cultural goods concerned. By analyzing the case concerning cultural objects whose elements are located in different states but which once belonged to a single collection, this article sheds light on the practical difficulties related to the private international law treatment of such collections, and thereby intends to contribute to filling in a gap in the literature. The difficulties include ascertaining the law applicable to the existence of connections between things, as well as to the main legal issue and the determination of jurisdiction.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Santander Art and Culture Law Review
Published
2025-09-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4467/2450050xsnr.25.005.21961
Primary Topic
Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Art Collections and Private International Law – The Case of the Esterházy Treasures

Tamás Szabados
Santander Art and Culture Law Review
Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction
article

Art Collections and Private International Law – The Case of the Esterházy Treasures

Tamás Szabados
article en

Abstract

In the Esterházy case, the plaintiff requested that Hungarian courts establish its ownership over cultural goods located in Hungary that had been part of the collection of the Fraknó castle of the aristocratic family through the centuries. History – through the removal of the goods from the castle; their nationalization; and the change of state borders – had an imprint on the legal status of the cultural goods concerned. By analyzing the case concerning cultural objects whose elements are located in different states but which once belonged to a single collection, this article sheds light on the practical difficulties related to the private international law treatment of such collections, and thereby intends to contribute to filling in a gap in the literature. The difficulties include ascertaining the law applicable to the existence of connections between things, as well as to the main legal issue and the determination of jurisdiction.

Santander Art and Culture Law ReviewVol. 11(1)
Eötvös Loránd University (HU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.