The Predictive Value of Clinical Signs to Identify Shock in Critically Ill Patients

<b>Background/Objectives:</b> Current guidelines recommend the use of clinical signs to diagnose shock and cellular hypoperfusion in critically ill patients. However, these recommendations are based on limited scientific evidence. The objective was to determine the predictive value of clinical signs to identify shock. <b>Methods:</b> Retrospective cohort study including adult (≥18 years) patients admitted to the critical care resuscitation unit of a tertiary hospital. The primary goal was to determine the predictive value of tachycardia, prolonged capillary refill time (CRT), skin mottling, weak radial pulse, inadequate peripheral perfusion, shock index > 0.8, altered mental state, and diaphoresis to identify shock. Two-by-two contingency tables were used for statistical analysis. <b>Results:</b> Three-hundred-seventeen patients (no shock, <i>n</i> = 231; shock, <i>n</i> = 86) were included. As a single clinical sign, skin mottling [sensitivity, 0.38; specificity, 0.92; negative likelihood ratio (LR-), 0.68; positive likelihood ratio (LR+), 4.62], prolonged CRT (sensitivity, 0.44; specificity, 0.89; LR-, 0.62; LR+, 4.17), shock index >0.8 [sensitivity, 0.77; specificity, 0.64; LR-, 0.36; LR+, 2.15], a weak radial pulse [sensitivity, 0.62; specificity, 0.79; LR-, 0.49; LR+, 2.88], and inadequate peripheral perfusion [sensitivity, 0.68; specificity, 0.73; LR-, 0.44; LR+, 2.52] predicted shock. Prolonged CRT, skin mottling, inadequate peripheral perfusion, a weak radial pulse, and a shock index >0.8 predicted shock states with low cardiac output. A shock index >0.8, tachycardia, and a weak radial pulse were predictive of distributive/vasodilatory shock. The accuracy to identify shock were higher if ≥2 clinical signs were present compared to only one. <b>Conclusions:</b> Skin mottling, prolonged CRT, shock index >0.8, weak radial pulse, and inadequate peripheral perfusion can identify patients with shock, particularly shock states with low cardiac output, with high specificity and LR+.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Diagnostics
Published
2025-09-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15172252
Primary Topic
Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Predictive Value of Clinical Signs to Identify Shock in Critically Ill Patients

Jens Meier, Thomas Tschoellitsch, Matthias Noitz, Romana Erblich et al.
Diagnostics
Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
article

The Predictive Value of Clinical Signs to Identify Shock in Critically Ill Patients

Jens Meier, Thomas Tschoellitsch, Matthias Noitz, Romana Erblich, Dominik Jenny, Martin W. Dünser, Sabine Preining, Simon Langthaler
article en

Abstract

<b>Background/Objectives:</b> Current guidelines recommend the use of clinical signs to diagnose shock and cellular hypoperfusion in critically ill patients. However, these recommendations are based on limited scientific evidence. The objective was to determine the predictive value of clinical signs to identify shock. <b>Methods:</b> Retrospective cohort study including adult (≥18 years) patients admitted to the critical care resuscitation unit of a tertiary hospital. The primary goal was to determine the predictive value of tachycardia, prolonged capillary refill time (CRT), skin mottling, weak radial pulse, inadequate peripheral perfusion, shock index > 0.8, altered mental state, and diaphoresis to identify shock. Two-by-two contingency tables were used for statistical analysis. <b>Results:</b> Three-hundred-seventeen patients (no shock, <i>n</i> = 231; shock, <i>n</i> = 86) were included. As a single clinical sign, skin mottling [sensitivity, 0.38; specificity, 0.92; negative likelihood ratio (LR-), 0.68; positive likelihood ratio (LR+), 4.62], prolonged CRT (sensitivity, 0.44; specificity, 0.89; LR-, 0.62; LR+, 4.17), shock index >0.8 [sensitivity, 0.77; specificity, 0.64; LR-, 0.36; LR+, 2.15], a weak radial pulse [sensitivity, 0.62; specificity, 0.79; LR-, 0.49; LR+, 2.88], and inadequate peripheral perfusion [sensitivity, 0.68; specificity, 0.73; LR-, 0.44; LR+, 2.52] predicted shock. Prolonged CRT, skin mottling, inadequate peripheral perfusion, a weak radial pulse, and a shock index >0.8 predicted shock states with low cardiac output. A shock index >0.8, tachycardia, and a weak radial pulse were predictive of distributive/vasodilatory shock. The accuracy to identify shock were higher if ≥2 clinical signs were present compared to only one. <b>Conclusions:</b> Skin mottling, prolonged CRT, shock index >0.8, weak radial pulse, and inadequate peripheral perfusion can identify patients with shock, particularly shock states with low cardiac output, with high specificity and LR+.

DiagnosticsVol. 15(17)
Johannes Kepler University of Linz (AT), Kepler Universitätsklinikum (AT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.