Risk-Informed Dual-Threshold Screening for SPT-Based Liquefaction: A Probability-Calibrated Random Forest Approach

Soil liquefaction poses a significant risk to foundations during earthquakes, prompting the need for simple, risk-aware screening tools that go beyond single deterministic boundaries. This study creates a probability-calibrated dual-threshold screening rule using a random forest (RF) classifier trained on 208 SPT case histories with quality-based weights (A/B/C = 1.0/0.70/0.40). The model is optimized with random search and calibrated through isotonic regression. Iso-probability contours from 1000 bootstrap samples produce paired thresholds for fines-corrected, overburden-normalized blow count N1,60,CS and normalized cyclic stress ratio CSR7.5,1 at target liquefaction probabilities Pliq = 5%, 20%, 50%, 80%, and 95%, with 90% confidence intervals. On an independent test set (n = 42), the calibrated model achieves AUC = 0.95, F1 = 0.92, and a better Brier score than the uncalibrated RF. The screening rule classifies a site as susceptible when N1,60,CS is at or below and CSR7.5,1 is at or above the probability-specific thresholds. Designed for level ground, free field, and clean-to-silty sand sites, this tool maintains the familiarity of SPT-based charts while making risk assessment transparent and auditable for different facility importance levels. Sensitivity tests show its robustness to reasonable rescaling of quality weights. The framework offers transparent thresholds with uncertainty bands for routine preliminary assessments and to guide the need for more detailed, site-specific analyses.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Buildings
Published
2025-09-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15173206
Primary Topic
Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Risk-Informed Dual-Threshold Screening for SPT-Based Liquefaction: A Probability-Calibrated Random Forest Approach

Hani S. Alharbi
Buildings
Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures
article

Risk-Informed Dual-Threshold Screening for SPT-Based Liquefaction: A Probability-Calibrated Random Forest Approach

Hani S. Alharbi
article en

Abstract

Soil liquefaction poses a significant risk to foundations during earthquakes, prompting the need for simple, risk-aware screening tools that go beyond single deterministic boundaries. This study creates a probability-calibrated dual-threshold screening rule using a random forest (RF) classifier trained on 208 SPT case histories with quality-based weights (A/B/C = 1.0/0.70/0.40). The model is optimized with random search and calibrated through isotonic regression. Iso-probability contours from 1000 bootstrap samples produce paired thresholds for fines-corrected, overburden-normalized blow count N1,60,CS and normalized cyclic stress ratio CSR7.5,1 at target liquefaction probabilities Pliq = 5%, 20%, 50%, 80%, and 95%, with 90% confidence intervals. On an independent test set (n = 42), the calibrated model achieves AUC = 0.95, F1 = 0.92, and a better Brier score than the uncalibrated RF. The screening rule classifies a site as susceptible when N1,60,CS is at or below and CSR7.5,1 is at or above the probability-specific thresholds. Designed for level ground, free field, and clean-to-silty sand sites, this tool maintains the familiarity of SPT-based charts while making risk assessment transparent and auditable for different facility importance levels. Sensitivity tests show its robustness to reasonable rescaling of quality weights. The framework offers transparent thresholds with uncertainty bands for routine preliminary assessments and to guide the need for more detailed, site-specific analyses.

BuildingsVol. 15(17)
Shaqra University (SA)
Shaqra University
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.