Disrupting Child Sexual Exploitation in New South Wales: A Mixed‐Method Survey Exploring Workforce Capacities

ABSTRACT Child sexual exploitation (CSE) is an insidious form of child sexual abuse (CSA) that impacts Australia's most vulnerable children and young people. Reports of CSE abuses experienced by children and young people living in out‐of‐home care (OOHC) have spurred urgent calls for improving responses to CSE in Australia. However, limited empirical research exists to inform policy and practice. This article presents findings from a pre‐training survey conducted in New South Wales, Australia, with child protection and law enforcement professionals. The mixed‐method survey sought to explore workforce understanding, practices, and confidence (‘capacities’) with recognising and responding to CSE. A total of 77 professionals working in OOHC services for the statutory child protection agency ( n = 33), non‐government organisations providing residential care ( n = 25), and police ( n = 19) participated in the survey. Findings point to the need for upskilling frontline professionals about the distinctiveness of CSE and practices they can engage in to both disrupt CSE and respond sensitively to victim‐survivors. Gaps in organisational capacity to disrupt CSE and enable multi‐agency working were also evident. The results reinforce calls for embedding a systemic framework for disrupting CSE across key areas: (1) legislation reform, (2) strengthening organisational policy and (3) workforce upskilling in proactive disruptive practices.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Australian Journal of Social Issues
Published
2025-09-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ajs4.70066
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Child Abuse and Trauma
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.31

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Disrupting Child Sexual Exploitation in New South Wales: A Mixed‐Method Survey Exploring Workforce Capacities

Sarah Ciftci, Susan Heward‐Belle, Hannah Wilkinson
1 citations
Australian Journal of Social Issues
Child Abuse and Trauma
2.31
article

Disrupting Child Sexual Exploitation in New South Wales: A Mixed‐Method Survey Exploring Workforce Capacities

Sarah Ciftci, Susan Heward‐Belle, Hannah Wilkinson
article en
1 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Child sexual exploitation (CSE) is an insidious form of child sexual abuse (CSA) that impacts Australia's most vulnerable children and young people. Reports of CSE abuses experienced by children and young people living in out‐of‐home care (OOHC) have spurred urgent calls for improving responses to CSE in Australia. However, limited empirical research exists to inform policy and practice. This article presents findings from a pre‐training survey conducted in New South Wales, Australia, with child protection and law enforcement professionals. The mixed‐method survey sought to explore workforce understanding, practices, and confidence (‘capacities’) with recognising and responding to CSE. A total of 77 professionals working in OOHC services for the statutory child protection agency ( n = 33), non‐government organisations providing residential care ( n = 25), and police ( n = 19) participated in the survey. Findings point to the need for upskilling frontline professionals about the distinctiveness of CSE and practices they can engage in to both disrupt CSE and respond sensitively to victim‐survivors. Gaps in organisational capacity to disrupt CSE and enable multi‐agency working were also evident. The results reinforce calls for embedding a systemic framework for disrupting CSE across key areas: (1) legislation reform, (2) strengthening organisational policy and (3) workforce upskilling in proactive disruptive practices.

Australian Journal of Social IssuesVol. 61(1)
The University of Sydney (AU)
University of Sydney, Australian Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Child Abuse and Trauma
2.31
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.