Fault Injection Evaluation with Statistical Analysis

A critical aspect of securing cryptographic hardware is their resistance to Fault Injection (FI) attacks, which involve the successful injection of faults into the system in operation. Specifically, a hardware design must be resilient to wellestablished fault injection techniques, including voltage or clock glitching, laser fault injections, and the more recently introduced Electromagnetic Fault Injection (EMFI). Ideally, the protection level must be verified before the chip is fabricated. Although initial efforts to verify the resistance of hardware designs against fault injection have been made, analyzing the security of practical designs with realistic gate counts under fault injections that affect multiple gates or the entire circuit state remains a significant challenge. This scenario, however, is considered more realistic than assessing resistance to a fixed, relatively small number of faults. In this work, we introduce FIESTA, a versatile automated framework for analyzing the resistance of hardware circuits under the general random fault model. By leveraging a nonexhaustive approach, FIESTA is capable of evaluating larger designs compared to state-of-the-art tools, while maintaining a reasonable level of confidence. FIESTA supports various adversary models, allowing customized resistance analysis against specific adversaries. In particular, we present a concrete procedure for evaluating more realistic precise adversaries, based on practical observations. Using FIESTA, we assessed the resistance of several (protected) Advanced Encryption Standard (AES) cores.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
IACR Transactions on Cryptographic Hardware and Embedded Systems
Published
2025-09-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.46586/tches.v2025.i4.215-253
Primary Topic
Physical Unclonable Functions (PUFs) and Hardware Security
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Fault Injection Evaluation with Statistical Analysis

Amir Moradi, Nicolai Müller, Felix Uhle
IACR Transactions on Cryptographic Hardware and Embedded Systems
Physical Unclonable Functions (PUFs) and Hardware Security
article

Fault Injection Evaluation with Statistical Analysis

Amir Moradi, Nicolai Müller, Felix Uhle
article en

Abstract

A critical aspect of securing cryptographic hardware is their resistance to Fault Injection (FI) attacks, which involve the successful injection of faults into the system in operation. Specifically, a hardware design must be resilient to wellestablished fault injection techniques, including voltage or clock glitching, laser fault injections, and the more recently introduced Electromagnetic Fault Injection (EMFI). Ideally, the protection level must be verified before the chip is fabricated. Although initial efforts to verify the resistance of hardware designs against fault injection have been made, analyzing the security of practical designs with realistic gate counts under fault injections that affect multiple gates or the entire circuit state remains a significant challenge. This scenario, however, is considered more realistic than assessing resistance to a fixed, relatively small number of faults. In this work, we introduce FIESTA, a versatile automated framework for analyzing the resistance of hardware circuits under the general random fault model. By leveraging a nonexhaustive approach, FIESTA is capable of evaluating larger designs compared to state-of-the-art tools, while maintaining a reasonable level of confidence. FIESTA supports various adversary models, allowing customized resistance analysis against specific adversaries. In particular, we present a concrete procedure for evaluating more realistic precise adversaries, based on practical observations. Using FIESTA, we assessed the resistance of several (protected) Advanced Encryption Standard (AES) cores.

IACR Transactions on Cryptographic Hardware and Embedded SystemsVol. 2025(4)
Technische Universität Darmstadt (DE), Ruhr University Bochum (DE)
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung, Korea Science and Engineering Foundation
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Physical Unclonable Functions (PUFs) and Hardware Security
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.