Barriers to Engagement in a Psychological Therapy group in a Multidisciplinary weight Management Program: a Qualitative Study (Hapifed-M)

Background: Participant feedback is critical in assessing how interventions influenced both their learning process, cognitive, and psychological outcomes. This qualitative study explored views and barriers to engagement in a psychological therapy group program as part of a multidisciplinary Weight Management Program (WMP) from the perspectives of individuals with higher body weight (HBW). Methods: This cohort comprised of individuals with obesity Class 3 (BMI ≥ 40 kg/m²), who were enrolled in a longitudinal WMP and had achieved a ≥10% body weight reduction. To maintain physical and mental health improvements, an in-person maintenance group focusing on consolidation of gains and relapse prevention was offered Healthy APproach to weIght management and Food in Eating Disorders-Maintenance (HAPIFED-M). Results: Following a thematic analysis using the Framework method, positive and negative feedback was provided by 19 participants in this study, examining six key themes: (1) Positive content of therapy, (2) Positive socialization and support, (3) Positive therapist features, (4) Negative time of therapy/personal circumstances, (5) Negative process of therapy, and (6) Negative content. Barriers to engagement included a preference for alternative activities and practical impediments. Conclusions: The findings highlight the importance of the therapeutic engagement, practical features such as timing of groups, and tailoring psychotherapy content to participant’s needs in order to achieve therapeutic engagement.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews
Published
2025-09-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31579/2690-4861/938
Primary Topic
Eating Disorders and Behaviors
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Barriers to Engagement in a Psychological Therapy group in a Multidisciplinary weight Management Program: a Qualitative Study (Hapifed-M)

Nasim Foroughi
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews
Eating Disorders and Behaviors
article

Barriers to Engagement in a Psychological Therapy group in a Multidisciplinary weight Management Program: a Qualitative Study (Hapifed-M)

Nasim Foroughi
article en

Abstract

Background: Participant feedback is critical in assessing how interventions influenced both their learning process, cognitive, and psychological outcomes. This qualitative study explored views and barriers to engagement in a psychological therapy group program as part of a multidisciplinary Weight Management Program (WMP) from the perspectives of individuals with higher body weight (HBW). Methods: This cohort comprised of individuals with obesity Class 3 (BMI ≥ 40 kg/m²), who were enrolled in a longitudinal WMP and had achieved a ≥10% body weight reduction. To maintain physical and mental health improvements, an in-person maintenance group focusing on consolidation of gains and relapse prevention was offered Healthy APproach to weIght management and Food in Eating Disorders-Maintenance (HAPIFED-M). Results: Following a thematic analysis using the Framework method, positive and negative feedback was provided by 19 participants in this study, examining six key themes: (1) Positive content of therapy, (2) Positive socialization and support, (3) Positive therapist features, (4) Negative time of therapy/personal circumstances, (5) Negative process of therapy, and (6) Negative content. Barriers to engagement included a preference for alternative activities and practical impediments. Conclusions: The findings highlight the importance of the therapeutic engagement, practical features such as timing of groups, and tailoring psychotherapy content to participant’s needs in order to achieve therapeutic engagement.

International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and ReviewsVol. 29(01)
Western Sydney University
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Eating Disorders and Behaviors
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.