Clostridium difficile Colonization in Oncologic Patients Undergoing Major Abdominopelvic Surgery: To Treat or Not to Treat? An Observational Study with Propensity Score Analysis

<i>Background: Clostridium difficile</i> colonization (CDC) represents a clinical concern in oncology patients undergoing abdominopelvic surgery, particularly regarding the potential role of prophylactic antibiotics in preventing progression to active infection. <i>Methods:</i> We performed a single-center, retrospective, case-matched observational study of oncology patients with CDC who underwent abdominopelvic surgery between 2018 and 2023. Patients were divided into two cohorts: those who received prophylactic antibiotics and those who did not. Postoperative outcomes were compared using propensity score matching (PSM). Logistic regression and ROC curve analysis were applied to assess the predictive value of antibiotics relative to other comorbidities. <i>Results:</i> Ninety patients were included (62 with antibiotics; 28 without). In the unmatched cohort, patients receiving antibiotics showed a non-significant trend toward higher morbidity (32.2% vs. 21.4%, <i>p</i> = 0.327) and surgical site infection rates (9.6% vs. 0%, <i>p</i> = 0.171). After PSM (26 patients per group), morbidity remained comparable between cohorts (30.7% vs. 23.0%, <i>p</i> = 0.538). Notably, no patient developed active <i>C. difficile</i> infection during follow-up, regardless of antibiotic use. Antibiotic therapy was not an independent predictor of postoperative morbidity (OR 1.746, <i>p</i> = 0.297; AUC 0.549, 95% CI 0.405-0.687). <i>Conclusions</i>: In this study, prophylactic antibiotic use in CDC patients undergoing abdominopelvic oncology surgery was not associated with improved postoperative outcomes. While no progression to active infection was observed, the potential benefits of prophylaxis remain uncertain. Larger, prospective studies are needed to clarify the clinical role of antibiotics in this setting.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicina
Published
2025-09-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina61091606
Primary Topic
Clostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Clostridium difficile Colonization in Oncologic Patients Undergoing Major Abdominopelvic Surgery: To Treat or Not to Treat? An Observational Study with Propensity Score Analysis

Sorinel Luncă, Ștefan Morărașu, Gabriel Mihail Dimofte, Wee Liam Ong et al.
Medicina
Clostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens research
article

Clostridium difficile Colonization in Oncologic Patients Undergoing Major Abdominopelvic Surgery: To Treat or Not to Treat? An Observational Study with Propensity Score Analysis

Sorinel Luncă, Ștefan Morărașu, Gabriel Mihail Dimofte, Wee Liam Ong, Romulus Mihaita Pruna, Raluca Zaharia
article en

Abstract

<i>Background: Clostridium difficile</i> colonization (CDC) represents a clinical concern in oncology patients undergoing abdominopelvic surgery, particularly regarding the potential role of prophylactic antibiotics in preventing progression to active infection. <i>Methods:</i> We performed a single-center, retrospective, case-matched observational study of oncology patients with CDC who underwent abdominopelvic surgery between 2018 and 2023. Patients were divided into two cohorts: those who received prophylactic antibiotics and those who did not. Postoperative outcomes were compared using propensity score matching (PSM). Logistic regression and ROC curve analysis were applied to assess the predictive value of antibiotics relative to other comorbidities. <i>Results:</i> Ninety patients were included (62 with antibiotics; 28 without). In the unmatched cohort, patients receiving antibiotics showed a non-significant trend toward higher morbidity (32.2% vs. 21.4%, <i>p</i> = 0.327) and surgical site infection rates (9.6% vs. 0%, <i>p</i> = 0.171). After PSM (26 patients per group), morbidity remained comparable between cohorts (30.7% vs. 23.0%, <i>p</i> = 0.538). Notably, no patient developed active <i>C. difficile</i> infection during follow-up, regardless of antibiotic use. Antibiotic therapy was not an independent predictor of postoperative morbidity (OR 1.746, <i>p</i> = 0.297; AUC 0.549, 95% CI 0.405-0.687). <i>Conclusions</i>: In this study, prophylactic antibiotic use in CDC patients undergoing abdominopelvic oncology surgery was not associated with improved postoperative outcomes. While no progression to active infection was observed, the potential benefits of prophylaxis remain uncertain. Larger, prospective studies are needed to clarify the clinical role of antibiotics in this setting.

MedicinaVol. 61(9)
Grigore T. Popa University of Medicine and Pharmacy (RO), Institutul Regional de Oncologie (RO)
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Clostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.