Strategic Challenges and Risk Governance in the Globalization of the Belt and Road Initiative

The Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), as China’s flagship international cooperation framework, aims to enhance regional connectivity and promote a new global economic order. However, escalating political risks among participating countries—especially terrorism, security instability, and institutional divergence—have significantly hindered its implementation. This paper adopts political risk as its analytical lens and employs a mixed-method approach, including index-based assessment, literature synthesis, and case comparisons, to identify key sources of uncertainty in the BRI process. It further examines root causes across economic, political, cultural, and technological dimensions. Based on the analysis, the study proposes a multi-level response strategy, including the construction of a community of shared responsibility, the development of risk early-warning systems, and the enhancement of institutional coordination. The findings aim to inform policy improvements and contribute to a more resilient and secure globalization process under the BRI framework.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PoliEcoM Administration Review
Published
2025-09-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.63802/pemr.v1.i1.101
Primary Topic
Global Peace and Security Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Strategic Challenges and Risk Governance in the Globalization of the Belt and Road Initiative

Xianfa Shang
PoliEcoM Administration Review
Global Peace and Security Dynamics
article

Strategic Challenges and Risk Governance in the Globalization of the Belt and Road Initiative

Xianfa Shang
article en

Abstract

The Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), as China’s flagship international cooperation framework, aims to enhance regional connectivity and promote a new global economic order. However, escalating political risks among participating countries—especially terrorism, security instability, and institutional divergence—have significantly hindered its implementation. This paper adopts political risk as its analytical lens and employs a mixed-method approach, including index-based assessment, literature synthesis, and case comparisons, to identify key sources of uncertainty in the BRI process. It further examines root causes across economic, political, cultural, and technological dimensions. Based on the analysis, the study proposes a multi-level response strategy, including the construction of a community of shared responsibility, the development of risk early-warning systems, and the enhancement of institutional coordination. The findings aim to inform policy improvements and contribute to a more resilient and secure globalization process under the BRI framework.

PoliEcoM Administration ReviewVol. 1(1)
Lanzhou University of Technology (CN), Lanzhou University of Finance and Economics (CN), Lanzhou University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Global Peace and Security Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.