Review of seepage physical models in oil and gas reservoirs

Understanding multiphase seepage behavior in porous media of oil and gas reservoirs is crucial for optimizing development strategies, enhancing recovery efficiency, and improving project economics. Physical simulation models, scaled-down replicas of reservoir conditions, deliver direct insights into petrophysical parameters and dynamic flow processes. This review systematically classified seepage physical models into one-dimensional (1D), two-dimensional (2D), and three-dimensional (3D) models, further delineated by structure, function, and application structure, function, and application. 1D models include sand-packed pipes, artificial cores, and natural cores models. 2D models encompass parallel plate, etched network, core slice, and particle packing models. 3D models comprise sand-packed, large-scale core, and visual models. A comprehensive discussion and systematic evaluation of these models were conducted, focusing on their advantages, limitations, error sources, and applicability. The results demonstrate that 1D models offer operational simplicity, high temperature and pressure resistance, and well-established fabrication techniques. However, they lack spatial representativeness, scaling similarity, and the capacity to capture heterogeneity. 2D models exhibit superior structural flexibility, functional diversity, and direct visualization capabilities, but cannot simulate complex 3D flow or replicate high temperature and pressure resistance conditions. 3D models minimize scaling effects, reliably simulate macroscopic flow dynamics, and withstand extreme conditions, but suffer from complex operation, prolonged experimental durations, and high cost. Given the flexibility and versatility, this paper further comprehensively reviews various types of 2D models, compares their visualization performance, representativeness, temperature and pressure resistance, applications, and constraints, and proposes potential refinements. Typical case studies illustrate practical implementations to promote the translation of theoretical research into field practice and to strengthen the connection between theory and application. Furthermore, we establish how numerical simulation and artificial intelligence transcend the limitations of physical models. This review provides a comprehensive, practical, and forward-looking reference for the selection, design, and application of physical seepage models in oil and gas reservoir studies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Physics of Fluids
Published
2025-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0286239
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Enhanced Oil Recovery Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.15

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Review of seepage physical models in oil and gas reservoirs

Chaoyang Du, Zhouhua Wang, Ping Guo, Zhengkun Tian et al.
1 citations
Physics of Fluids
Enhanced Oil Recovery Techniques
1.15
article

Review of seepage physical models in oil and gas reservoirs

Chaoyang Du, Zhouhua Wang, Ping Guo, Zhengkun Tian, Zhou Ru
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Understanding multiphase seepage behavior in porous media of oil and gas reservoirs is crucial for optimizing development strategies, enhancing recovery efficiency, and improving project economics. Physical simulation models, scaled-down replicas of reservoir conditions, deliver direct insights into petrophysical parameters and dynamic flow processes. This review systematically classified seepage physical models into one-dimensional (1D), two-dimensional (2D), and three-dimensional (3D) models, further delineated by structure, function, and application structure, function, and application. 1D models include sand-packed pipes, artificial cores, and natural cores models. 2D models encompass parallel plate, etched network, core slice, and particle packing models. 3D models comprise sand-packed, large-scale core, and visual models. A comprehensive discussion and systematic evaluation of these models were conducted, focusing on their advantages, limitations, error sources, and applicability. The results demonstrate that 1D models offer operational simplicity, high temperature and pressure resistance, and well-established fabrication techniques. However, they lack spatial representativeness, scaling similarity, and the capacity to capture heterogeneity. 2D models exhibit superior structural flexibility, functional diversity, and direct visualization capabilities, but cannot simulate complex 3D flow or replicate high temperature and pressure resistance conditions. 3D models minimize scaling effects, reliably simulate macroscopic flow dynamics, and withstand extreme conditions, but suffer from complex operation, prolonged experimental durations, and high cost. Given the flexibility and versatility, this paper further comprehensively reviews various types of 2D models, compares their visualization performance, representativeness, temperature and pressure resistance, applications, and constraints, and proposes potential refinements. Typical case studies illustrate practical implementations to promote the translation of theoretical research into field practice and to strengthen the connection between theory and application. Furthermore, we establish how numerical simulation and artificial intelligence transcend the limitations of physical models. This review provides a comprehensive, practical, and forward-looking reference for the selection, design, and application of physical seepage models in oil and gas reservoir studies.

Physics of FluidsVol. 37(9)
Southwest Petroleum University (CN), Tarim University (CN), State Key Laboratory of Oil and Gas Reservoir Geology and Exploitation (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Enhanced Oil Recovery Techniques
1.15
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.