Dissecting inequity: global systematic review of trauma clinical guidance

The reviewed trauma clinical guidance published between 2016 and 2023 predominantly featured authors from HICs, with limited representation from LMICs, despite LMICs bearing a higher injury burden. Only 14% of guidance considered pediatric populations, although trauma is the leading cause of death among this group. Most guidance was published in English, with over 80% being open access. The mean quality score of included guidance, assessed by the NEATS scorecard, was 3.81 out of 5. Enhancing trauma guidance impact may require promoting LMIC authorship, fostering multiregional collaborations and addressing barriers such as cost, registration and language.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Trauma Surgery & Acute Care Open
Published
2025-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1136/tsaco-2024-001624
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Trauma and Emergency Care Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.51
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Dissecting inequity: global systematic review of trauma clinical guidance

Mohamed Albirair, Lacey N. LaGrone, Colby G. Simmons, Gabriela Zavala Wong et al.
2 citations
Trauma Surgery & Acute Care Open
Trauma and Emergency Care Studies
4.51
article

Dissecting inequity: global systematic review of trauma clinical guidance

Mohamed Albirair, Lacey N. LaGrone, Colby G. Simmons, Gabriela Zavala Wong, Ashley Farley, Jakob E. Gamboa, Maclean S. Panshin, Tina Samsamshariat
article en
2 citations

Abstract

The reviewed trauma clinical guidance published between 2016 and 2023 predominantly featured authors from HICs, with limited representation from LMICs, despite LMICs bearing a higher injury burden. Only 14% of guidance considered pediatric populations, although trauma is the leading cause of death among this group. Most guidance was published in English, with over 80% being open access. The mean quality score of included guidance, assessed by the NEATS scorecard, was 3.81 out of 5. Enhancing trauma guidance impact may require promoting LMIC authorship, fostering multiregional collaborations and addressing barriers such as cost, registration and language.

Trauma Surgery & Acute Care OpenVol. 10(Suppl 5)
University of Southern California (US), University of Maryland, Baltimore (US), Gates Foundation (US), Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia (PE), University of Washington (US), University of Colorado Health (US), Centro Peruano de Estudios Sociales (PE), University of Colorado Denver (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Trauma and Emergency Care Studies
4.51
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Dissecting inequity: global systematic review of trauma clinical guidance — Mohamed Albirair, Lacey N. LaGrone, et al. · Trauma Surgery & Acute Care Open (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS