State-Engineered Pedagogy: Deconstructing China's "AI+" Action in a New Era of Geopolitical Competition

This paper provides a systematic deconstruction of the education-focused provisions within China's 2025 State Council directive, the "AI+" Action (Guo Fa No. 11). It introduces and develops the theoretical framework of "state-engineered pedagogy"—the deliberate, top-down use of technology by a state to systematically reshape teaching and learning processes to align with national economic and strategic objectives. Utilizing a methodology of policy text analysis, comparative policy mapping, and illustrative case studies substantiated with independent evidence, this paper argues that China's strategy aims to construct a new human-machine collaborative learning paradigm with a dual purpose: to drive domestic educational reform and to cultivate a future workforce capable of securing long-term technological self-reliance and shaping global standards. Through a multi-layered analysis of the policy's architecture, historical evolution, international context, and ethical risks, this paper contends that while the "AI+" mandate promises unprecedented personalization, it also introduces profound risks related to data privacy, algorithmic governance, and the creation of an "algorithmic panopticon." The execution of this policy thus serves as a critical case study in 21st-century statecraft and the global contest over the future of technology and society.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Artificial Intelligence Education Studies
Published
2025-09-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.6914/fgpf2x28
Primary Topic
University-Industry-Government Innovation Models
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

State-Engineered Pedagogy: Deconstructing China's "AI+" Action in a New Era of Geopolitical Competition

Changkui LI
Artificial Intelligence Education Studies
University-Industry-Government Innovation Models
article

State-Engineered Pedagogy: Deconstructing China's "AI+" Action in a New Era of Geopolitical Competition

Changkui LI
article en

Abstract

This paper provides a systematic deconstruction of the education-focused provisions within China's 2025 State Council directive, the "AI+" Action (Guo Fa No. 11). It introduces and develops the theoretical framework of "state-engineered pedagogy"—the deliberate, top-down use of technology by a state to systematically reshape teaching and learning processes to align with national economic and strategic objectives. Utilizing a methodology of policy text analysis, comparative policy mapping, and illustrative case studies substantiated with independent evidence, this paper argues that China's strategy aims to construct a new human-machine collaborative learning paradigm with a dual purpose: to drive domestic educational reform and to cultivate a future workforce capable of securing long-term technological self-reliance and shaping global standards. Through a multi-layered analysis of the policy's architecture, historical evolution, international context, and ethical risks, this paper contends that while the "AI+" mandate promises unprecedented personalization, it also introduces profound risks related to data privacy, algorithmic governance, and the creation of an "algorithmic panopticon." The execution of this policy thus serves as a critical case study in 21st-century statecraft and the global contest over the future of technology and society.

Artificial Intelligence Education StudiesVol. 1(3)
Applied Science and Technology Research Institute (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
University-Industry-Government Innovation Models
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.