Performance differences and design method improvement of Laval nozzles under superatmospheric and subatmospheric conditions

To enhance the performance of subatmospheric supersonic wind tunnels, this study explores the design of Laval nozzle profiles using the method of characteristics. For Mach numbers ranging from 1.2 to 1.8, various nozzle designs are validated using numerical simulations, and the performance differences between superatmospheric and subatmospheric conditions are analyzed. An improved formula for boundary layer correction under subatmospheric conditions is developed using the least-squares method, and its reliability is numerically verified. All nozzle designs considered in this study perform outstandingly in superatmospheric conditions, with outlet Mach number errors of less than 0.2%. Under subatmospheric conditions, the outlet Mach number errors increase by a factor of ten, and the maximum total pressure loss coefficient approaches 5.57%, representing an increase in almost 30% over the superatmospheric case. The reduced Reynolds number of subatmospheric conditions causes areas of high total pressure loss to accumulate near the wall boundary layer, which induces an increase in the boundary layer displacement of 0.2–0.4 mm and reduces the effective expansion ratio by 0.24%–0.67%. The improved boundary layer correction formula has broad applicability for Mach 1.1–2.0 nozzles under subatmospheric conditions. In such scenarios, the improved nozzles reduce the total pressure loss by 22.18%–32.37% compared with unimproved nozzles.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Physics of Fluids
Published
2025-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0282385
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Rocket and propulsion systems research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.99

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Performance differences and design method improvement of Laval nozzles under superatmospheric and subatmospheric conditions

Debin Li, Jianchi Xin, Shuang Guo, Huawei Lu et al.
1 citations
Physics of Fluids
Rocket and propulsion systems research
4.99
article

Performance differences and design method improvement of Laval nozzles under superatmospheric and subatmospheric conditions

Debin Li, Jianchi Xin, Shuang Guo, Huawei Lu, Benli Peng, Zhitao Tian, Y. Ma
article en
1 citations

Abstract

To enhance the performance of subatmospheric supersonic wind tunnels, this study explores the design of Laval nozzle profiles using the method of characteristics. For Mach numbers ranging from 1.2 to 1.8, various nozzle designs are validated using numerical simulations, and the performance differences between superatmospheric and subatmospheric conditions are analyzed. An improved formula for boundary layer correction under subatmospheric conditions is developed using the least-squares method, and its reliability is numerically verified. All nozzle designs considered in this study perform outstandingly in superatmospheric conditions, with outlet Mach number errors of less than 0.2%. Under subatmospheric conditions, the outlet Mach number errors increase by a factor of ten, and the maximum total pressure loss coefficient approaches 5.57%, representing an increase in almost 30% over the superatmospheric case. The reduced Reynolds number of subatmospheric conditions causes areas of high total pressure loss to accumulate near the wall boundary layer, which induces an increase in the boundary layer displacement of 0.2–0.4 mm and reduces the effective expansion ratio by 0.24%–0.67%. The improved boundary layer correction formula has broad applicability for Mach 1.1–2.0 nozzles under subatmospheric conditions. In such scenarios, the improved nozzles reduce the total pressure loss by 22.18%–32.37% compared with unimproved nozzles.

Physics of FluidsVol. 37(9)
Dalian Ocean University (CN), Liaoning University (CN), Dalian Maritime University (CN), Nanchang Hangkong University (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Rocket and propulsion systems research
4.99
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.