Reconstructive Arthroplasty for Malignant Bone Tumors of the Knee—A Single-Center Experience of Functionality and Quality of Life

<b>Background/Objectives:</b> Resection arthroplasty is well established in treating bone defects following tumor resection, with the distal femur and proximal tibia being its most common localizations. The aim of this study was to analyze the functional outcomes and quality of life following endoprosthetic reconstruction for malignant bone tumors of the knee joint. <b>Methods:</b> We retrospectively included all patients treated with an endoprosthetic reconstruction following resection of a malignant bone tumor of the knee at our institution. Functional outcomes (KOOS, OKS, MSTS, and KSS) and health-related quality of life scores [QoL] (SF-36, Karnofsky Index) were evaluated. Chi-square and Fisher's exact test was used for categorical variables, T-test and Whitney U-Mann tests for continuous variables. Survival was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier curves. <b>Results:</b> 32 patients were included. A total of 12 patients had died at the time of follow-up. Among the remaining 20 patients (m:w 17:3), mean follow-up was 8.1 years (range, 8.12 ± 6.8). Mean age at the time of tumor diagnosis was 50 ± 23.3 (10-83) years. According to age, patients were divided into two groups (group C1: <29 years, group C2: >29 years). Group C1 showed significantly better results regarding functional outcome (<i>p</i> < 0.05). The anatomic location of the replacement and a revision surgery did not influence the functional outcome (<i>p</i> > 0.05). QoL showed no significant differences in subgroup analysis (<i>p</i> > 0.05). Primary bone tumors had a significantly better survival (primary tumor: 216.90 months [168.42-265.83]; secondary tumor: 37.03 months [11.71-62.35] <i>p</i> = 0.01). Furthermore, pathologic fractures were associated with significantly worse survival (pathologic fracture: 50.24 months [0.00-102.43]; pathologic fracture 190.63 moths [139.28-241.45]; <i>p</i> = 0.007). <b>Conclusions:</b> Knee resection arthroplasty can offer meaningful long-term functional outcomes and acceptable quality of life in selected patients with musculoskeletal tumors. While the rarity and heterogeneity of such cases remain a challenge, our findings contribute to the growing evidence supporting this complex but limb-sparing surgical option.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2025-09-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14176287
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Sarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.52
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reconstructive Arthroplasty for Malignant Bone Tumors of the Knee—A Single-Center Experience of Functionality and Quality of Life

Daniel Rau, Leonard Thielscher, Michael Putzier, Silvan Wittenberg et al.
1 citations
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Sarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment
1.52
article

Reconstructive Arthroplasty for Malignant Bone Tumors of the Knee—A Single-Center Experience of Functionality and Quality of Life

Daniel Rau, Leonard Thielscher, Michael Putzier, Silvan Wittenberg, Thilo Khakzad, Nima Taheri, Sven Märdian, Alp Paksoy
article en
1 citations

Abstract

<b>Background/Objectives:</b> Resection arthroplasty is well established in treating bone defects following tumor resection, with the distal femur and proximal tibia being its most common localizations. The aim of this study was to analyze the functional outcomes and quality of life following endoprosthetic reconstruction for malignant bone tumors of the knee joint. <b>Methods:</b> We retrospectively included all patients treated with an endoprosthetic reconstruction following resection of a malignant bone tumor of the knee at our institution. Functional outcomes (KOOS, OKS, MSTS, and KSS) and health-related quality of life scores [QoL] (SF-36, Karnofsky Index) were evaluated. Chi-square and Fisher's exact test was used for categorical variables, T-test and Whitney U-Mann tests for continuous variables. Survival was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier curves. <b>Results:</b> 32 patients were included. A total of 12 patients had died at the time of follow-up. Among the remaining 20 patients (m:w 17:3), mean follow-up was 8.1 years (range, 8.12 ± 6.8). Mean age at the time of tumor diagnosis was 50 ± 23.3 (10-83) years. According to age, patients were divided into two groups (group C1: <29 years, group C2: >29 years). Group C1 showed significantly better results regarding functional outcome (<i>p</i> < 0.05). The anatomic location of the replacement and a revision surgery did not influence the functional outcome (<i>p</i> > 0.05). QoL showed no significant differences in subgroup analysis (<i>p</i> > 0.05). Primary bone tumors had a significantly better survival (primary tumor: 216.90 months [168.42-265.83]; secondary tumor: 37.03 months [11.71-62.35] <i>p</i> = 0.01). Furthermore, pathologic fractures were associated with significantly worse survival (pathologic fracture: 50.24 months [0.00-102.43]; pathologic fracture 190.63 moths [139.28-241.45]; <i>p</i> = 0.007). <b>Conclusions:</b> Knee resection arthroplasty can offer meaningful long-term functional outcomes and acceptable quality of life in selected patients with musculoskeletal tumors. While the rarity and heterogeneity of such cases remain a challenge, our findings contribute to the growing evidence supporting this complex but limb-sparing surgical option.

Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 14(17)
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Sarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment
1.52
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.