The regulation of social media commerce under the DSA: A consumer protection perspective

Social media commerce, defined as the direct selling of goods and services through social media, is emerging as a prominent business model in the platform economy. As social media platforms introduce e-commerce features, they are becoming what I call social marketplaces: a new category of online platforms found at the intersection of social networks and online marketplaces. This article examines how the Digital Services Act (DSA) protects consumers in relation to social media commerce, and what specific obligations it imposes on social marketplaces to increase transparency in online transactions. While the DSA does not explicitly address social media commerce, it indirectly applies through Section 4 which imposes obligations on ‘online platforms allowing consumers to conclude distance contracts with traders'. I argue that because social marketplaces fall within this category of online platforms, they are subject to the obligations laid down in Section 4 DSA, namely Article 30 DSA (traceability of traders), Article 31 DSA (compliance by design), and Article 32 DSA (right to information). This article critically analyses the application of these provisions to social marketplaces and examines their interaction with EU consumer laws. Based on the analysis, it identifies three shortcomings in the DSA’s approach to protecting consumers on social marketplaces: (i) regulatory complexity due to overlaps with the EU consumer acquis , (ii) interpretative ambiguity, as the DSA was not designed with social marketplaces in mind, and (iii) an enforcement gap specific to social media commerce. Rather than calling for new legislation, this article concludes that effective consumer protection on social marketplaces requires clarifying the interaction between legal instruments, interpreting existing provisions in light of evolving platform practices, and ensuring coordinated enforcement across relevant actors.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Computer law & security review
Published
2025-09-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2025.106181
Citations
1
Primary Topic
E-commerce and Technology Innovations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.45

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The regulation of social media commerce under the DSA: A consumer protection perspective

Laura Aade
1 citations
Computer law & security review
E-commerce and Technology Innovations
2.45
article

The regulation of social media commerce under the DSA: A consumer protection perspective

Laura Aade
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Social media commerce, defined as the direct selling of goods and services through social media, is emerging as a prominent business model in the platform economy. As social media platforms introduce e-commerce features, they are becoming what I call social marketplaces: a new category of online platforms found at the intersection of social networks and online marketplaces. This article examines how the Digital Services Act (DSA) protects consumers in relation to social media commerce, and what specific obligations it imposes on social marketplaces to increase transparency in online transactions. While the DSA does not explicitly address social media commerce, it indirectly applies through Section 4 which imposes obligations on ‘online platforms allowing consumers to conclude distance contracts with traders'. I argue that because social marketplaces fall within this category of online platforms, they are subject to the obligations laid down in Section 4 DSA, namely Article 30 DSA (traceability of traders), Article 31 DSA (compliance by design), and Article 32 DSA (right to information). This article critically analyses the application of these provisions to social marketplaces and examines their interaction with EU consumer laws. Based on the analysis, it identifies three shortcomings in the DSA’s approach to protecting consumers on social marketplaces: (i) regulatory complexity due to overlaps with the EU consumer acquis , (ii) interpretative ambiguity, as the DSA was not designed with social marketplaces in mind, and (iii) an enforcement gap specific to social media commerce. Rather than calling for new legislation, this article concludes that effective consumer protection on social marketplaces requires clarifying the interaction between legal instruments, interpreting existing provisions in light of evolving platform practices, and ensuring coordinated enforcement across relevant actors.

Computer law & security reviewVol. 59
University of Luxembourg (LU), Luxembourg School of Business (LU)
Fonds National de la Recherche Luxembourg
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
E-commerce and Technology Innovations
2.45
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.