Contribution of auditory distance cues to size constancy in perception and grasping in restricted viewing

When vision is restricted, proprioceptive distance cues fully restore size constancy for scaling grip aperture when grasping objects, despite only limited improvement in perceptual judgments of object size. This suggests that specific task demands and associated neural mechanisms determine the relative weighting of cues during multisensory integration. Is this specific to proprioceptive cues? Here, we examined the contribution of auditory information to perception and action systems under restricted viewing conditions. Surprisingly, in contrast to proprioception, providing auditory distance information had no impact whatsoever on size constancy in grasping but did improve perceptual judgments of size. After participants received extensive training in discriminating distance from auditory cues, there was a modest improvement in grip scaling. Taken together, we suggest that the neural mechanisms mediating grasping cannot incorporate distance information from audition as easily as they can from proprioception when computing real-world object size, but this ability can be improved with training.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
iScience
Published
2025-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2025.113341
Primary Topic
Visual perception and processing mechanisms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Contribution of auditory distance cues to size constancy in perception and grasping in restricted viewing

Juan Chen, Melvyn A. Goodale, Xiaoming Zhou, Irene Sperandio et al.
iScience
Visual perception and processing mechanisms
article

Contribution of auditory distance cues to size constancy in perception and grasping in restricted viewing

Juan Chen, Melvyn A. Goodale, Xiaoming Zhou, Irene Sperandio, Gexiu Wang, Chao Zheng, Jie Gao
article en

Abstract

When vision is restricted, proprioceptive distance cues fully restore size constancy for scaling grip aperture when grasping objects, despite only limited improvement in perceptual judgments of object size. This suggests that specific task demands and associated neural mechanisms determine the relative weighting of cues during multisensory integration. Is this specific to proprioceptive cues? Here, we examined the contribution of auditory information to perception and action systems under restricted viewing conditions. Surprisingly, in contrast to proprioception, providing auditory distance information had no impact whatsoever on size constancy in grasping but did improve perceptual judgments of size. After participants received extensive training in discriminating distance from auditory cues, there was a modest improvement in grip scaling. Taken together, we suggest that the neural mechanisms mediating grasping cannot incorporate distance information from audition as easily as they can from proprioception when computing real-world object size, but this ability can be improved with training.

iScienceVol. 28(9)
Western University (CA), South China Normal University (CN), University of Trento (IT), East China Normal University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
Visual perception and processing mechanisms
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Contribution of auditory distance cues to size constancy in perception and grasping in restricted viewing — Juan Chen, Melvyn A. Goodale, et al. · iScience (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS