Multiplicity Control in Oncology Clinical Trials With a Binary Surrogate Endpoint‐Based Drop‐The‐Losers Design

Typical phase 1 oncology studies identify the maximum tolerated dose as the "optimal" dose for subsequent phases. With the advancement of molecular targeted agents and immunotherapies, however, evaluating two or more doses has become increasingly critical for dose selection. Such evaluation is often done in phase 2 studies in a randomized manner. In this article, we evaluate the strategy of applying an adaptive phase 2/3 seamless design for dose selection in oncology studies. Specifically, we consider the "drop-the-losers" design, where multiple treatment arms and a control arm are administered during the initial stage, and a more effective arm is identified for later stages by a binary surrogate endpoint such as overall response. We derive the theoretical type I error inflation scale and conduct simulation studies to illustrate the impact of various factors on the type I error inflation in such designs. Furthermore, we demonstrate the findings through the design of a lung cancer trial and introduce a software that implements the proposed design.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Statistics in Medicine
Published
2025-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.70209
Primary Topic
Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Multiplicity Control in Oncology Clinical Trials With a Binary Surrogate Endpoint‐Based Drop‐The‐Losers Design

Jing‐ou Liu, Chenguang Wang, Weibin Zhong
1 links
Statistics in Medicine
Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
article

Multiplicity Control in Oncology Clinical Trials With a Binary Surrogate Endpoint‐Based Drop‐The‐Losers Design

Jing‐ou Liu, Chenguang Wang, Weibin Zhong
article en

Abstract

Typical phase 1 oncology studies identify the maximum tolerated dose as the "optimal" dose for subsequent phases. With the advancement of molecular targeted agents and immunotherapies, however, evaluating two or more doses has become increasingly critical for dose selection. Such evaluation is often done in phase 2 studies in a randomized manner. In this article, we evaluate the strategy of applying an adaptive phase 2/3 seamless design for dose selection in oncology studies. Specifically, we consider the "drop-the-losers" design, where multiple treatment arms and a control arm are administered during the initial stage, and a more effective arm is identified for later stages by a binary surrogate endpoint such as overall response. We derive the theoretical type I error inflation scale and conduct simulation studies to illustrate the impact of various factors on the type I error inflation in such designs. Furthermore, we demonstrate the findings through the design of a lung cancer trial and introduce a software that implements the proposed design.

Statistics in MedicineVol. 44(20-22)
Regeneron (United States) (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Multiplicity Control in Oncology Clinical Trials With a Binary Surrogate Endpoint‐Based Drop‐The‐Losers Design — Jing‐ou Liu, Chenguang Wang, et al. · Statistics in Medicine (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS