Uncovering differential tolerance to deletions versus substitutions with a protein language model

Deep mutational scanning (DMS) experiments have been successfully leveraged to understand genotype to phenotype mapping. However, the overwhelming majority of DMS have focused on amino acid substitutions. Thus, it remains unclear how indels differentially shape the fitness landscape relative to substitutions. To further our understanding of the relationship between substitutions and deletions, we leveraged a protein language model to analyze every single amino acid deletion in the human proteome. We discovered hundreds of thousands of sites that display opposing behavior for deletions versus substitutions: sites that can tolerate being substituted but not deleted or vice versa. We identified secondary structural elements and sequence context to be important mediators of differential tolerance. Our results underscore the value of deletion-substitution comparisons at the genome-wide scale, provide novel insights into how substitutions could systematically differ from deletions, and showcase the power of protein language models to generate biological hypotheses in silico.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cell Systems
Published
2025-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cels.2025.101373
Primary Topic
RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Uncovering differential tolerance to deletions versus substitutions with a protein language model

Prathamesh Chati, Grant Goldman, Vasilis Ntranos
Cell Systems
RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
article

Uncovering differential tolerance to deletions versus substitutions with a protein language model

Prathamesh Chati, Grant Goldman, Vasilis Ntranos
article en

Abstract

Deep mutational scanning (DMS) experiments have been successfully leveraged to understand genotype to phenotype mapping. However, the overwhelming majority of DMS have focused on amino acid substitutions. Thus, it remains unclear how indels differentially shape the fitness landscape relative to substitutions. To further our understanding of the relationship between substitutions and deletions, we leveraged a protein language model to analyze every single amino acid deletion in the human proteome. We discovered hundreds of thousands of sites that display opposing behavior for deletions versus substitutions: sites that can tolerate being substituted but not deleted or vice versa. We identified secondary structural elements and sequence context to be important mediators of differential tolerance. Our results underscore the value of deletion-substitution comparisons at the genome-wide scale, provide novel insights into how substitutions could systematically differ from deletions, and showcase the power of protein language models to generate biological hypotheses in silico.

Cell SystemsVol. 16(9)
University of California, San Francisco (US), University of California San Francisco Medical Center (US)
National Institutes of Health, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institute of General Medical Sciences
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.