Include all children – a discussion of improving self-report measures of violence for overlooked child populations

To protect children against violence, we need robust data from every child population. In spite of this, not all child populations are well represented in research. This hampers the usability of results to those left out, and necessitate a discussion of potential solutions. Data collection efforts are hampered by a lack of validated instruments for a number of populations, including but not limited to young children, children with disabilities, and children on the move, including refugees and immigrants. This results in the exclusion from research of many children who are disproportionately affected by violence, but unable to exercise their right to be heard on this matter. In this discussion article, we draw on the co-authors’ research experience and relevant literature to present issues specific to measurement of violence, and recommendations on how to get precise estimates in these underrepresented groups. These include puppet-based interviews for young children, alternative response formats such as validated sign language instruments for children with disabilities, and a range of violence measures which reflect the diverse violence experienced by children on the move. However, the literature also reveals an overall lack of validation and participatory approaches, affecting both research measuring violence against children, and development of instruments for this purpose. This article outlines recommendations and examples of best practice for including these children in research, and for the development and validation of instruments suitable for capturing their self-report of violence. It is our hope that this discussion article, and the potential solutions presented, can inspire further studies on violence on how to include all child populations in research. • Violence to children either 4–9 years, with disabilities, or refugees is less studied. • Digital puppet-interviews is a simple and feasible approach for young children. • Simplified language and visual aids provide means of access for disabled children. • A locally adapted range of violent experience items improves accuracy of data. • For all instruments, validity is a key focus that needs more research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Child Protection and Practice
Published
2025-09-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chipro.2025.100234
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Child Abuse and Trauma
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.31

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Include all children – a discussion of improving self-report measures of violence for overlooked child populations

Stephanie Lange, Tobias Hecker, Sophia Backhaus, Vania Sandoz et al.
1 citations
Child Protection and Practice
Child Abuse and Trauma
2.31
article

Include all children – a discussion of improving self-report measures of violence for overlooked child populations

Stephanie Lange, Tobias Hecker, Sophia Backhaus, Vania Sandoz, Troels Græsholt‐Knudsen, Carolina Jernbro, Franziska Meinck, Gertrud Sofie Hafstad, Lakshmi Neelakantan, Katrin Chauviré-Geib, Dennis Oberleiter, Aya Fujita, Meret Sophie Wallimann, Lucas Wissmann
article en
1 citations

Abstract

To protect children against violence, we need robust data from every child population. In spite of this, not all child populations are well represented in research. This hampers the usability of results to those left out, and necessitate a discussion of potential solutions. Data collection efforts are hampered by a lack of validated instruments for a number of populations, including but not limited to young children, children with disabilities, and children on the move, including refugees and immigrants. This results in the exclusion from research of many children who are disproportionately affected by violence, but unable to exercise their right to be heard on this matter. In this discussion article, we draw on the co-authors’ research experience and relevant literature to present issues specific to measurement of violence, and recommendations on how to get precise estimates in these underrepresented groups. These include puppet-based interviews for young children, alternative response formats such as validated sign language instruments for children with disabilities, and a range of violence measures which reflect the diverse violence experienced by children on the move. However, the literature also reveals an overall lack of validation and participatory approaches, affecting both research measuring violence against children, and development of instruments for this purpose. This article outlines recommendations and examples of best practice for including these children in research, and for the development and validation of instruments suitable for capturing their self-report of violence. It is our hope that this discussion article, and the potential solutions presented, can inspire further studies on violence on how to include all child populations in research. • Violence to children either 4–9 years, with disabilities, or refugees is less studied. • Digital puppet-interviews is a simple and feasible approach for young children. • Simplified language and visual aids provide means of access for disabled children. • A locally adapted range of violent experience items improves accuracy of data. • For all instruments, validity is a key focus that needs more research.

Child Protection and PracticeVol. 7
Vaal University of Technology (ZA), United States Department of Education (US), University of the Witwatersrand (ZA), Bielefeld University (DE), University of Zurich (CH), Hochschule Bielefeld (DE), Aarhus University (DK), Oxford Policy Management (GB), Norwegian Centre for Violence and Traumatic Stress Studies (NO), German Center for Infection Research (DE), German Centre for Cardiovascular Research (DE), University Hospital Ulm (DE), Melbourne Health (AU), Karlstad University (SE), Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE), University of Amsterdam (NL), University of Lausanne (CH), University of Edinburgh (GB)
UK Research and Innovation, Horizon 2020 Framework Programme, European Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Child Abuse and Trauma
2.31
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.