An Improved Fruit Fly Optimization Algorithm for Robot Path Planning with Dynamic Obstacles

In order to better solve the robot path planning problems with dynamic obstacles, an improved fruit fly optimization algorithm (IFOA) is proposed. Based on the original algorithm, the following improvement measures are proposed. Firstly, chaos initialization is applied to improve the quality of the initial population. Secondly, the idea of adaptive step lengths is introduced to improve the convergence speed and solving precision of the algorithm. Then the proposed concept of density factor can effectively prevent fruit fly population from falling into the local optima. Finally, a parallel strategy is brought in to make the algorithm more effective for the balance of global search and local search. Based on two typical maps, considering the obstacles with uniform linear motion and circular motion, the mathematical optimization model for the path planning problems is established and the following problem-solving strategy is presented. First, Dijkstra algorithm is employed to obtain the coarse-grained paths, then optimized algorithms are used to obtain final planned paths. By simulation data analysis and result comparisons, the feasibility and effectiveness of the proposed IFOA algorithm for solving this kind of dynamic obstacle path planning problems are verified.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-06-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/icetac65964.2025.11144337
Primary Topic
Robotic Path Planning Algorithms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An Improved Fruit Fly Optimization Algorithm for Robot Path Planning with Dynamic Obstacles

Guangqiang Li, Ruoxi Liu, Linlin Xie, Xiangrong Zhu
Robotic Path Planning Algorithms
article

An Improved Fruit Fly Optimization Algorithm for Robot Path Planning with Dynamic Obstacles

Guangqiang Li, Ruoxi Liu, Linlin Xie, Xiangrong Zhu
article en

Abstract

In order to better solve the robot path planning problems with dynamic obstacles, an improved fruit fly optimization algorithm (IFOA) is proposed. Based on the original algorithm, the following improvement measures are proposed. Firstly, chaos initialization is applied to improve the quality of the initial population. Secondly, the idea of adaptive step lengths is introduced to improve the convergence speed and solving precision of the algorithm. Then the proposed concept of density factor can effectively prevent fruit fly population from falling into the local optima. Finally, a parallel strategy is brought in to make the algorithm more effective for the balance of global search and local search. Based on two typical maps, considering the obstacles with uniform linear motion and circular motion, the mathematical optimization model for the path planning problems is established and the following problem-solving strategy is presented. First, Dijkstra algorithm is employed to obtain the coarse-grained paths, then optimized algorithms are used to obtain final planned paths. By simulation data analysis and result comparisons, the feasibility and effectiveness of the proposed IFOA algorithm for solving this kind of dynamic obstacle path planning problems are verified.

Dalian Maritime University (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, Dalian Maritime University
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
Robotic Path Planning Algorithms
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

An Improved Fruit Fly Optimization Algorithm for Robot Path Planning with Dynamic Obstacles — Guangqiang Li, Ruoxi Liu, et al. · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS