Practice effects on digital cognitive assessment tools: insights from the defense automated neurobehavioral assessment battery

We systematically evaluated practice effects using the DANA battery as a case study. Modest practice effects were observed across two testing sessions, with a median inter-session interval of 93 days. Cognitive impairment was significantly associated with slower response times in key tasks (p < 0.001). Our framework offers a systematic approach for evaluating practice effects in digital cognitive tools.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Published
2025-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.70644
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.86

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Practice effects on digital cognitive assessment tools: insights from the defense automated neurobehavioral assessment battery

Vijaya B. Kolachalama, Rhoda Au, Honghuang Lin, Matteo Bellitti et al.
2 citations
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
2.86
article

Practice effects on digital cognitive assessment tools: insights from the defense automated neurobehavioral assessment battery

Vijaya B. Kolachalama, Rhoda Au, Honghuang Lin, Matteo Bellitti, Meagan Lauber, Edward Searls
article en
2 citations

Abstract

We systematically evaluated practice effects using the DANA battery as a case study. Modest practice effects were observed across two testing sessions, with a median inter-session interval of 93 days. Cognitive impairment was significantly associated with slower response times in key tasks (p < 0.001). Our framework offers a systematic approach for evaluating practice effects in digital cognitive tools.

Alzheimer s & DementiaVol. 21(9)
Boston University (US), Boston Medical Center (US), University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School (US), University of Massachusetts Boston (US), Framingham Heart Study (US)
American Heart Association, National Institutes of Health
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
2.86
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Practice effects on digital cognitive assessment tools: insights from the defense automated neurobehavioral assessment battery — Vijaya B. Kolachalama, Rhoda Au, et al. · Alzheimer s & Dementia (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS