Transformative Innovation Policy: An Analytical Review of Key Methods and Challenges

Systems such as energy, food, and mobility are currently organized in unsustainable modes of production and consumption, with negative consequences on social justice and planetary health. Disruptive and systemic innovations are required, beyond solely improving technologies or financial instruments, to address wicked and complex societal and environmental challenges. Transformative innovation policy (TIP) is a new generation of innovation policy that promises to enable just transitions in these socio-technical systems. The promise is to be able to tackle wicked problems and polycrisis of inequities, social injustices, environmental degradations, and accelerated impacts of climate change through new policymaking approaches that support, nurture, and scale transformative socio-technical innovations. We review emerging TIP literature to discuss key elements in TIP design and implementation, such as experiment, monitoring, and learning through formative evaluation; codesigning a systemic theory of change; enhancing policy capabilities; building knowledge infrastructure; and empowering communities of practice. Two cases in Spain and Indonesia illustrate key aspects of the TIP method. Our major contribution lies in articulating what an alternative innovation policy could look like to mitigate transformational failures observed in current system change efforts and explore how directionalities such as being democratic, elevating decolonial sensibilities, enhancing well-being, and navigating futures can make innovation policies more transformative. Policymakers must adopt new ways of thinking and acting on persistent challenges, beyond the traditional way of setting social and climate targets at the beginning of policy process and a summative policy evaluation at the very end. TIPs of the future should incorporate multiple directionalities negotiated among diverse actors and knowledge systems and by learning from failure in context-sensitive ways.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Annual Review of Environment and Resources
Published
2025-09-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-111523-102251
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Innovation and Socioeconomic Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.89
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Transformative Innovation Policy: An Analytical Review of Key Methods and Challenges

Patience Mguni, Suci Lestari Yuana, Bipashyee Ghosh, Keya Chakraborty et al.
2 citations
Annual Review of Environment and Resources
Innovation and Socioeconomic Development
4.89
article

Transformative Innovation Policy: An Analytical Review of Key Methods and Challenges

Patience Mguni, Suci Lestari Yuana, Bipashyee Ghosh, Keya Chakraborty, Diana Carolina Velasco Malaver
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Systems such as energy, food, and mobility are currently organized in unsustainable modes of production and consumption, with negative consequences on social justice and planetary health. Disruptive and systemic innovations are required, beyond solely improving technologies or financial instruments, to address wicked and complex societal and environmental challenges. Transformative innovation policy (TIP) is a new generation of innovation policy that promises to enable just transitions in these socio-technical systems. The promise is to be able to tackle wicked problems and polycrisis of inequities, social injustices, environmental degradations, and accelerated impacts of climate change through new policymaking approaches that support, nurture, and scale transformative socio-technical innovations. We review emerging TIP literature to discuss key elements in TIP design and implementation, such as experiment, monitoring, and learning through formative evaluation; codesigning a systemic theory of change; enhancing policy capabilities; building knowledge infrastructure; and empowering communities of practice. Two cases in Spain and Indonesia illustrate key aspects of the TIP method. Our major contribution lies in articulating what an alternative innovation policy could look like to mitigate transformational failures observed in current system change efforts and explore how directionalities such as being democratic, elevating decolonial sensibilities, enhancing well-being, and navigating futures can make innovation policies more transformative. Policymakers must adopt new ways of thinking and acting on persistent challenges, beyond the traditional way of setting social and climate targets at the beginning of policy process and a summative policy evaluation at the very end. TIPs of the future should incorporate multiple directionalities negotiated among diverse actors and knowledge systems and by learning from failure in context-sensitive ways.

Annual Review of Environment and ResourcesVol. 50(1)
University of Copenhagen (DK), Manipal Academy of Higher Education (IN), Universitas Gadjah Mada (ID), Stellenbosch University (ZA), Department of Science and Technology (IN), University College London (GB), Universitat Politècnica de València (ES), IT University of Copenhagen (DK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Innovation and Socioeconomic Development
4.89
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.