Investment decision model for CO2 utilization projects: An empirical study on CO2 mineralization curing

The investment decision of CO 2 utilization projects faces complexity arising from sunk costs, return uncertainty, timing flexibility, and divergent sub-technology learning rates. Existing research largely focuses on single-dimensional uncertainty analysis, which fails to adequately address the combined effects of technological, carbon price, and market uncertainties, leading to potentially inaccurate investment valuations. To address this limitation, this study proposes an integrated analytic framework that integrates a component-based technological learning model with a trinomial tree model and Geometric Brownian Motion, which can simultaneously capture the dynamics of carbon and product prices, and account for heterogeneous learning rates across key technological components, and determine the optimal project investment timing under uncertainty. Applying this framework to a carbonation-cured concrete case study reveals an optimal investment window before 2040, empirical results show that under a high learning scenario,.the operational cost of emerging components decreases by up to 46.2 %, higher than that of other mature components. CCU product price volatility increases the critical carbon price, while a positive drift rate significantly reduces the investment threshold, though its impact diminishes beyond a drift rate of 0.05. Ultimately, the real options model generates a valuation premium of up to ¥6.1 billion compared to the static NPV, validating the value of deferred flexibility. Investment timing analysis reveals a delay of 3–4 years under volatility and exhibits a non-monotonic shift with increasing drift. This method provides quantitative guidance for low-carbon technology investment under uncertainty. • Develop a real options model linking tech progress with market uncertainties. • Propose a component-based heterogeneous learning curve for carbon utilization. • Reveal how learning rates significantly affect the optimal investment timing.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Energy
Published
2025-09-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2025.126699
Citations
1
Primary Topic
CO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.80
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Investment decision model for CO2 utilization projects: An empirical study on CO2 mineralization curing

Lan-Cui Liu, Yan‐Ling Ji, Yi‐Ming Wei, Xiangyuan Tian et al.
1 citations
Applied Energy
CO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions
0.80
article

Investment decision model for CO2 utilization projects: An empirical study on CO2 mineralization curing

Lan-Cui Liu, Yan‐Ling Ji, Yi‐Ming Wei, Xiangyuan Tian, Yunlong Zhang, Jia-Ning Kang
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The investment decision of CO 2 utilization projects faces complexity arising from sunk costs, return uncertainty, timing flexibility, and divergent sub-technology learning rates. Existing research largely focuses on single-dimensional uncertainty analysis, which fails to adequately address the combined effects of technological, carbon price, and market uncertainties, leading to potentially inaccurate investment valuations. To address this limitation, this study proposes an integrated analytic framework that integrates a component-based technological learning model with a trinomial tree model and Geometric Brownian Motion, which can simultaneously capture the dynamics of carbon and product prices, and account for heterogeneous learning rates across key technological components, and determine the optimal project investment timing under uncertainty. Applying this framework to a carbonation-cured concrete case study reveals an optimal investment window before 2040, empirical results show that under a high learning scenario,.the operational cost of emerging components decreases by up to 46.2 %, higher than that of other mature components. CCU product price volatility increases the critical carbon price, while a positive drift rate significantly reduces the investment threshold, though its impact diminishes beyond a drift rate of 0.05. Ultimately, the real options model generates a valuation premium of up to ¥6.1 billion compared to the static NPV, validating the value of deferred flexibility. Investment timing analysis reveals a delay of 3–4 years under volatility and exhibits a non-monotonic shift with increasing drift. This method provides quantitative guidance for low-carbon technology investment under uncertainty. • Develop a real options model linking tech progress with market uncertainties. • Propose a component-based heterogeneous learning curve for carbon utilization. • Reveal how learning rates significantly affect the optimal investment timing.

Applied EnergyVol. 401
Beijing Institute of Technology (CN), Beijing Normal University (CN), National Center for Climate Change Strategy and International Cooperation (CN), Chalmers University of Technology (SE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
CO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions
0.80
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.