Pre-service teachers as readers: moving beyond reading frequency as a marker of engagement

Abstract In the light of an international decline in children and young people choosing to read, it is important that pre-service teachers are supported to become reading role models who can authentically share their passion and pleasure in reading. Yet studies indicate pre-service teachers are neither keen or confident readers, and if they read infrequently, they are deemed by researchers to be unenthusiastic and disengaged. In this study of pre-service teachers from three English universities, the data revealed that contrary to some commentators’ views, those who read infrequently were positively disposed towards reading, they saw themselves as readers and enjoyed reading. By employing three different analytical approaches: quantitative survey data, corpus linguistics methods to open-up survey responses, and ‘reading life-story’ vignettes, a more nuanced understanding of these readers who rarely read but still value the activity, was developed. Barriers encountered by the pre-service teachers are examined, and potential ways forward offered, including eschewing over-reliance on reading frequency as the dominant method to discern pre-service teachers’ attitudes to and pleasure in reading.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Australian Journal of Language and Literacy
Published
2025-09-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s44020-025-00085-x
Primary Topic
Reading and Literacy Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Pre-service teachers as readers: moving beyond reading frequency as a marker of engagement

Sarah Jane Mukherjee, Teresa Cremin, Dana Therova, Eve Bearne
The Australian Journal of Language and Literacy
Reading and Literacy Development
article

Pre-service teachers as readers: moving beyond reading frequency as a marker of engagement

Sarah Jane Mukherjee, Teresa Cremin, Dana Therova, Eve Bearne
article en

Abstract

Abstract In the light of an international decline in children and young people choosing to read, it is important that pre-service teachers are supported to become reading role models who can authentically share their passion and pleasure in reading. Yet studies indicate pre-service teachers are neither keen or confident readers, and if they read infrequently, they are deemed by researchers to be unenthusiastic and disengaged. In this study of pre-service teachers from three English universities, the data revealed that contrary to some commentators’ views, those who read infrequently were positively disposed towards reading, they saw themselves as readers and enjoyed reading. By employing three different analytical approaches: quantitative survey data, corpus linguistics methods to open-up survey responses, and ‘reading life-story’ vignettes, a more nuanced understanding of these readers who rarely read but still value the activity, was developed. Barriers encountered by the pre-service teachers are examined, and potential ways forward offered, including eschewing over-reliance on reading frequency as the dominant method to discern pre-service teachers’ attitudes to and pleasure in reading.

The Australian Journal of Language and LiteracyVol. 48(3)
The Open University (GB), University of Bath (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Reading and Literacy Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Pre-service teachers as readers: moving beyond reading frequency as a marker of engagement — Sarah Jane Mukherjee, Teresa Cremin, et al. · The Australian Journal of Language and Literacy (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS