DEVELOPMENT OF PROBLEM-SOLVING SKILLS IN PHYSICS THROUGH METACOGNITIVE STRATEGIES

The article deals with The development of Problem-Solving Skills in Physics through Metacognitive Strategies by Yo. A. Mamatokhunov and D. F. Kholmirzayeva explores the significant role that metacognitive strategies play in enhancing students’ abilities to solve complex physics problems. It underscores the need to incorporate metacognitive tools into the educational process, aiming to cultivate higher levels of self-awareness, self-regulation, and cognitive control during learning activities. The authors methodically discuss the key stages of applying metacognitive strategies, such as planning, monitoring, evaluating, and reflecting, and how these stages influence academic performance. Students who engaged in systematic metacognitive training demonstrated considerable improvements in problem recognition, logical sequencing, solution accuracy, and overall academic achievement. The study relies on experimental data comparing an experimental group that implemented metacognitive strategies with a control group adhering to traditional instruction. The results highlight a significant increase in problem-solving skills, with the experimental group outperforming the control group both in average scores and in the quality of cognitive engagement. The theoretical framework draws from foundational theories such as Barry Zimmerman's model of self-regulated learning, John Sweller’s cognitive load theory, and P. Y. Galperin’s concept of phased mental action development. Each theory supports the notion that conscious control over cognitive processes is essential for effective and independent learning, especially in subjects like physics that demand critical and systematic thinking. By promoting practices like reflection journals, "think-aloud" protocols, peer explanation exercises, and error analysis discussions, the implementation of metacognitive strategies fosters students’ ability to self-assess, adjust their learning trajectories, and internalize effective problem-solving methodologies. The research concludes that integrating metacognitive strategies into physics education not only enhances subject-specific competence but also develops transferable skills vital for lifelong learning, critical thinking, and adaptability in complex situations. The authors advocate for a broader adoption of these approaches within educational systems to empower students with sustainable cognitive and self-regulatory abilities.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Вестник Иссык-Кульского университета.
Published
2025-04-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.69722/1694-8211-2025-62-73-82
Primary Topic
Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

DEVELOPMENT OF PROBLEM-SOLVING SKILLS IN PHYSICS THROUGH METACOGNITIVE STRATEGIES

Yo. A. Mamatokhunov, D. F. Kholmirzayeva
Вестник Иссык-Кульского университета.
Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
article

DEVELOPMENT OF PROBLEM-SOLVING SKILLS IN PHYSICS THROUGH METACOGNITIVE STRATEGIES

Yo. A. Mamatokhunov, D. F. Kholmirzayeva
article en

Abstract

The article deals with The development of Problem-Solving Skills in Physics through Metacognitive Strategies by Yo. A. Mamatokhunov and D. F. Kholmirzayeva explores the significant role that metacognitive strategies play in enhancing students’ abilities to solve complex physics problems. It underscores the need to incorporate metacognitive tools into the educational process, aiming to cultivate higher levels of self-awareness, self-regulation, and cognitive control during learning activities. The authors methodically discuss the key stages of applying metacognitive strategies, such as planning, monitoring, evaluating, and reflecting, and how these stages influence academic performance. Students who engaged in systematic metacognitive training demonstrated considerable improvements in problem recognition, logical sequencing, solution accuracy, and overall academic achievement. The study relies on experimental data comparing an experimental group that implemented metacognitive strategies with a control group adhering to traditional instruction. The results highlight a significant increase in problem-solving skills, with the experimental group outperforming the control group both in average scores and in the quality of cognitive engagement. The theoretical framework draws from foundational theories such as Barry Zimmerman's model of self-regulated learning, John Sweller’s cognitive load theory, and P. Y. Galperin’s concept of phased mental action development. Each theory supports the notion that conscious control over cognitive processes is essential for effective and independent learning, especially in subjects like physics that demand critical and systematic thinking. By promoting practices like reflection journals, "think-aloud" protocols, peer explanation exercises, and error analysis discussions, the implementation of metacognitive strategies fosters students’ ability to self-assess, adjust their learning trajectories, and internalize effective problem-solving methodologies. The research concludes that integrating metacognitive strategies into physics education not only enhances subject-specific competence but also develops transferable skills vital for lifelong learning, critical thinking, and adaptability in complex situations. The authors advocate for a broader adoption of these approaches within educational systems to empower students with sustainable cognitive and self-regulatory abilities.

Вестник Иссык-Кульского университета.(62)
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.