Chitosan Bioceramic Composites for Bone Regeneration: Insights from <i>In Vitro</i> and <i>In Vivo</i> Studies

Bone-related pathologies due to injuries, trauma, and disease are a burden on the current health system that will only continue to grow as the population's life expectancy increases. The field of biomaterials aims to address these concerns by exploring, investigating, and optimizing bioregenerative grafts. In the context of bone regeneration, many biomaterials aim to achieve autograft-level regenerative properties, such as osteoconduction, osteoinduction, and low immunogenicity but also aim to address the disadvantages, such as the need for a secondary operation, donor site burden, and limited donor availability. Chitosan (CS) is a natural polymer well-studied in the field of biomaterials; it is known for its ease of fabrication, biocompatibility, antibacterial nature, and being a nonproteinaceous polysaccharide, which offers the advantage of low immunogenicity. However, CS lacks any osteogenic potential and is often combined with a bioceramic, creating a biocomposite scaffold. Bioceramics are ceramics specifically designed to aid bone regeneration due to their potential osteogenic properties. Although CS-bioceramic composites have been extensively studied, most research emphasizes their physicochemical properties, with limited attention to biological performance and <i>in vivo</i> outcomes. This review presents current findings on the regenerative potential of various CS-bioceramic composites, with a particular focus on <i>in vitro</i> and <i>in vivo</i> studies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Tissue Engineering Part A
Published
2025-10-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/19373341251372969
Primary Topic
Bone Tissue Engineering Materials
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Chitosan Bioceramic Composites for Bone Regeneration: Insights from In Vitro and In Vivo Studies

Jeffrey Huang, George J. Dias, Maree Gould, Jithendra Ratnayake
Tissue Engineering Part A
Bone Tissue Engineering Materials
article

Chitosan Bioceramic Composites for Bone Regeneration: Insights from In Vitro and In Vivo Studies

Jeffrey Huang, George J. Dias, Maree Gould, Jithendra Ratnayake
article en

Abstract

Bone-related pathologies due to injuries, trauma, and disease are a burden on the current health system that will only continue to grow as the population's life expectancy increases. The field of biomaterials aims to address these concerns by exploring, investigating, and optimizing bioregenerative grafts. In the context of bone regeneration, many biomaterials aim to achieve autograft-level regenerative properties, such as osteoconduction, osteoinduction, and low immunogenicity but also aim to address the disadvantages, such as the need for a secondary operation, donor site burden, and limited donor availability. Chitosan (CS) is a natural polymer well-studied in the field of biomaterials; it is known for its ease of fabrication, biocompatibility, antibacterial nature, and being a nonproteinaceous polysaccharide, which offers the advantage of low immunogenicity. However, CS lacks any osteogenic potential and is often combined with a bioceramic, creating a biocomposite scaffold. Bioceramics are ceramics specifically designed to aid bone regeneration due to their potential osteogenic properties. Although CS-bioceramic composites have been extensively studied, most research emphasizes their physicochemical properties, with limited attention to biological performance and <i>in vivo</i> outcomes. This review presents current findings on the regenerative potential of various CS-bioceramic composites, with a particular focus on <i>in vitro</i> and <i>in vivo</i> studies.

Tissue Engineering Part A
University of Otago (NZ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Bone Tissue Engineering Materials
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.