‘Is it me or my illness?’: self-illness ambiguity as a useful conceptual lens for psychiatry

The complex relation between a person and their mental disorder is a recurring theme in (reflections on) psychiatric practice. As there is no uncontested concept of 'self', nor of 'mental disorder', the 'self-illness' relation is riddled with ambiguity. In this feature article, we summarise recent philosophical work on the phenomenon of 'self-illness ambiguity', to provide conceptual tools for psychiatric reflections on the self-illness relation. Specifically, we argue that the concept of self-illness ambiguity may contribute to patients' self-understanding and shed light on how paradigms of care and research should be revised in order to help clinicians support that self-understanding. We also suggest that the concept of self-illness ambiguity may improve the understanding of particular mental disorders, and may offer conceptual tools to address various ethical matters (including stigma and responsibility).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The British Journal of Psychiatry
Published
2025-09-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.2025.10367
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Mental Health and Psychiatry
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
17.27

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

‘Is it me or my illness?’: self-illness ambiguity as a useful conceptual lens for psychiatry

Anna Golova, Roy Dings
1 citations
The British Journal of Psychiatry
Mental Health and Psychiatry
17.27
article

‘Is it me or my illness?’: self-illness ambiguity as a useful conceptual lens for psychiatry

Anna Golova, Roy Dings
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The complex relation between a person and their mental disorder is a recurring theme in (reflections on) psychiatric practice. As there is no uncontested concept of 'self', nor of 'mental disorder', the 'self-illness' relation is riddled with ambiguity. In this feature article, we summarise recent philosophical work on the phenomenon of 'self-illness ambiguity', to provide conceptual tools for psychiatric reflections on the self-illness relation. Specifically, we argue that the concept of self-illness ambiguity may contribute to patients' self-understanding and shed light on how paradigms of care and research should be revised in order to help clinicians support that self-understanding. We also suggest that the concept of self-illness ambiguity may improve the understanding of particular mental disorders, and may offer conceptual tools to address various ethical matters (including stigma and responsibility).

The British Journal of PsychiatryVol. 228(3)
Radboud University Nijmegen (NL), University Medical Center Utrecht (NL), University of Oxford (GB), Amsterdam University Medical Centers (NL)
Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek, Arts and Humanities Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Mental Health and Psychiatry
17.27
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.