Negative Entities: Modes of Being or Degrees of Being?

Abstract Negative entities such as holes, cavities, and shadows are metaphysically puzzling. Despite evidence supporting their existence, their nature as absences of positive entities raises questions about their ontological status. How can negative beings exist while differing fundamentally from positive entities? To address this issue, Kris McDaniel’s ontological pluralism offers a solution by granting negative entities “being by courtesy.” This article reviews McDaniel’s proposal, presents a challenge to it, and offers an alternative solution within the framework of ontological pluralism. The conclusion addresses an objection and provides a response, contributing to the ongoing debate about the metaphysical reality of negative entities.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Dialogue
Published
2025-09-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/s0012217325100747
Primary Topic
Philosophy and Theoretical Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Negative Entities: Modes of Being or Degrees of Being?

Ataollah Hashemi, Davood Hosseini
Dialogue
Philosophy and Theoretical Science
article

Negative Entities: Modes of Being or Degrees of Being?

Ataollah Hashemi, Davood Hosseini
article en

Abstract

Abstract Negative entities such as holes, cavities, and shadows are metaphysically puzzling. Despite evidence supporting their existence, their nature as absences of positive entities raises questions about their ontological status. How can negative beings exist while differing fundamentally from positive entities? To address this issue, Kris McDaniel’s ontological pluralism offers a solution by granting negative entities “being by courtesy.” This article reviews McDaniel’s proposal, presents a challenge to it, and offers an alternative solution within the framework of ontological pluralism. The conclusion addresses an objection and provides a response, contributing to the ongoing debate about the metaphysical reality of negative entities.

Dialogue
Tarbiat Modares University (IR), University of Missouri–St. Louis (US), Institute for Research in Fundamental Sciences (IR), Saint Louis University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Philosophy and Theoretical Science
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Negative Entities: Modes of Being or Degrees of Being? — Ataollah Hashemi, Davood Hosseini · Dialogue (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS