Government Leadership and Market Participation: A Collaborative Development Model for the Cultural Ecosystem Services of Nature Reserves

Abstract Natural protected areas possess abundant cultural ecosystem services (CESs), requiring integrated efforts from both government and market for development; however, disagreements and debates regarding respective development boundaries are ongoing. This study establishes a theoretical framework for observation and analysis using protected areas in state-owned forest regions of NE China as a case study. Data were collected from multiple stakeholders. The research results show the following. (1) Protected areas in NE China’s state-owned forests contain at least five types of CES. Among these, scientific research (mean = 3.877), education (mean = 3.907), and psychological benefits (mean = 3.930) were rated higher than spiritual values (mean = 2.908) and recreation (mean = 2.898). (2) Government intervention and market demand not only directly improve the quality and efficiency of CES development but also leverage the foundational advantages of resource endowment and development level to indirectly enhance CES outcomes. (3) In the development of CES in protected areas, the government focuses on ecological conservation and restoration, whereas the market prioritizes economic value. This study constructs a framework for understanding the complex causal relationships between CES development approaches and their effectiveness. It also clarifies the development boundaries between government and market roles in protected areas.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Forest Products Journal
Published
2025-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.13073/fpj-d-25-00028
Primary Topic
Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Government Leadership and Market Participation: A Collaborative Development Model for the Cultural Ecosystem Services of Nature Reserves

Zhonghe Zhang, W. Liu, Meng Lin, Yue Song
Forest Products Journal
Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
article

Government Leadership and Market Participation: A Collaborative Development Model for the Cultural Ecosystem Services of Nature Reserves

Zhonghe Zhang, W. Liu, Meng Lin, Yue Song
article en

Abstract

Abstract Natural protected areas possess abundant cultural ecosystem services (CESs), requiring integrated efforts from both government and market for development; however, disagreements and debates regarding respective development boundaries are ongoing. This study establishes a theoretical framework for observation and analysis using protected areas in state-owned forest regions of NE China as a case study. Data were collected from multiple stakeholders. The research results show the following. (1) Protected areas in NE China’s state-owned forests contain at least five types of CES. Among these, scientific research (mean = 3.877), education (mean = 3.907), and psychological benefits (mean = 3.930) were rated higher than spiritual values (mean = 2.908) and recreation (mean = 2.898). (2) Government intervention and market demand not only directly improve the quality and efficiency of CES development but also leverage the foundational advantages of resource endowment and development level to indirectly enhance CES outcomes. (3) In the development of CES in protected areas, the government focuses on ecological conservation and restoration, whereas the market prioritizes economic value. This study constructs a framework for understanding the complex causal relationships between CES development approaches and their effectiveness. It also clarifies the development boundaries between government and market roles in protected areas.

Forest Products JournalVol. 75(3)
Heilongjiang University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.