Origin and geodynamic setting of adakitic intrusions in the Bairong porphyry Cu–Mo deposit, central Gangdese Belt, Tibet

• Hybridization of mantle and crustal magmas. • Tethyan oceanic component as metasomatic agent. • The contribution of mantle material significantly enhances the potential for mineralization. Situated in the heart of the Gangdese metallogenic province in southern Tibet, the Bairong Cu-Mo porphyry deposit anchors itself within the core sector of one of Asia’s most prolific porphyry Cu domains. Three distinct stages of Miocene granitic intrusions have been identified in this deposit: Pre–mineralized porphyritic monzogranite (PMG; 16.9‒12.7 Ma), syn -mineralized monzogranite porphyry (MGP; 13.9‒12.1 Ma), post–mineralized dacite porphyry (11.8–11.6 Ma). The magma from all three stages is characterized by high oxygen fugacity and H 2 O-rich. However, the differences in the sources of magma and ore-forming materials between ore-bearing and barren intrusions, as well as the genesis of adakite features in the Bairong Cu-Mo deposit, are not well understood. In this study, we conducted systematic geochemical and Sr-Nd-Pb-Hf-O isotopic analysis on the ore-bearing monzogranite (MZG), mineralized mafic enclaves (MMEs) within the MZG and ore-barren tonalite-porphyrite (TP) from the Bairong deposit. The ore-bearing MZG and MMEs exhibit remarkably consistent Sr–Nd–Pb–Hf–O isotopic compositions. In contrast, the ore-barren TP displays distinctly different isotopic signatures, characterized by significantly lower ε Nd (t) values (as low as –8.65) and markedly higher 87 Sr/ 86 Sr(t) ratios (up to 0.707973). The ore-bearing MZG and its MMEs also show notably lower δ 18 O values (down to 5.2 ‰) and lower Pb isotopic ratios, with 206 Pb/ 204 Pb(t), 207 Pb/ 204 Pb(t), and 208 Pb/ 204 Pb(t) reaching minimum values of 18.4968, 15.6647, and 38.8553, respectively. These isotopic compositions indicate that both the MMEs and their host granitoids originated through hybridization between mantle-derived mafic melts and crustal-derived felsic magmas. Notably, the ore-bearing MZG and MMEs exhibit a greater mantle contribution than the ore-barren TP. The lithospheric mantle source of the Bairong MMEs and their host rocks experienced metasomatism, with the metasomatic agents likely related to subducted components from the Tethyan Ocean. The injection of mantle-derived magmas contributed additional water and ore-forming metal elements to the mineralization process. The adakitic features of the Bairong magmas likely formed during magmatic differentiation (e.g., amphibole fractionation) rather than being directly inherited from their primary magma source.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ore Geology Reviews
Published
2025-09-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oregeorev.2025.106867
Primary Topic
Geological and Geochemical Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Origin and geodynamic setting of adakitic intrusions in the Bairong porphyry Cu–Mo deposit, central Gangdese Belt, Tibet

Wenchang Li, Hua Jiang, Sheng Li, Fucheng Yang et al.
Ore Geology Reviews
Geological and Geochemical Analysis
article

Origin and geodynamic setting of adakitic intrusions in the Bairong porphyry Cu–Mo deposit, central Gangdese Belt, Tibet

Wenchang Li, Hua Jiang, Sheng Li, Fucheng Yang, Zhongbiao Xu, Xiaoyu Wang
article en

Abstract

• Hybridization of mantle and crustal magmas. • Tethyan oceanic component as metasomatic agent. • The contribution of mantle material significantly enhances the potential for mineralization. Situated in the heart of the Gangdese metallogenic province in southern Tibet, the Bairong Cu-Mo porphyry deposit anchors itself within the core sector of one of Asia’s most prolific porphyry Cu domains. Three distinct stages of Miocene granitic intrusions have been identified in this deposit: Pre–mineralized porphyritic monzogranite (PMG; 16.9‒12.7 Ma), syn -mineralized monzogranite porphyry (MGP; 13.9‒12.1 Ma), post–mineralized dacite porphyry (11.8–11.6 Ma). The magma from all three stages is characterized by high oxygen fugacity and H 2 O-rich. However, the differences in the sources of magma and ore-forming materials between ore-bearing and barren intrusions, as well as the genesis of adakite features in the Bairong Cu-Mo deposit, are not well understood. In this study, we conducted systematic geochemical and Sr-Nd-Pb-Hf-O isotopic analysis on the ore-bearing monzogranite (MZG), mineralized mafic enclaves (MMEs) within the MZG and ore-barren tonalite-porphyrite (TP) from the Bairong deposit. The ore-bearing MZG and MMEs exhibit remarkably consistent Sr–Nd–Pb–Hf–O isotopic compositions. In contrast, the ore-barren TP displays distinctly different isotopic signatures, characterized by significantly lower ε Nd (t) values (as low as –8.65) and markedly higher 87 Sr/ 86 Sr(t) ratios (up to 0.707973). The ore-bearing MZG and its MMEs also show notably lower δ 18 O values (down to 5.2 ‰) and lower Pb isotopic ratios, with 206 Pb/ 204 Pb(t), 207 Pb/ 204 Pb(t), and 208 Pb/ 204 Pb(t) reaching minimum values of 18.4968, 15.6647, and 38.8553, respectively. These isotopic compositions indicate that both the MMEs and their host granitoids originated through hybridization between mantle-derived mafic melts and crustal-derived felsic magmas. Notably, the ore-bearing MZG and MMEs exhibit a greater mantle contribution than the ore-barren TP. The lithospheric mantle source of the Bairong MMEs and their host rocks experienced metasomatism, with the metasomatic agents likely related to subducted components from the Tethyan Ocean. The injection of mantle-derived magmas contributed additional water and ore-forming metal elements to the mineralization process. The adakitic features of the Bairong magmas likely formed during magmatic differentiation (e.g., amphibole fractionation) rather than being directly inherited from their primary magma source.

Ore Geology ReviewsVol. 186
Kunming University of Science and Technology (CN), China Geological Survey (CN), China University of Geosciences (CN), China University of Geosciences (Beijing) (CN), Zhaotong University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Geological and Geochemical Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.