Life cycle assessment of the integrating system of anaerobic digestion and aerobic composting for treating rural organic solid waste

With the rapid development of modern society and the continuous increase in resource consumption in rural areas of China, the management of rural organic solid wastes has encountered substantial environmental and economic challenges. Although the integration of anaerobic digestion and aerobic composting offers promising potential for sustainable rural organic solid waste management, comprehensive environmental evaluations of this integrated system remain limited, representing a critical research gap. This study employed life cycle assessment to compare the integrated system with standalone anaerobic digestion and aerobic composting scenarios, assessing eighteen mid-point impact categories and three end-point indicators (human health, ecosystems, and resources). The results demonstrated that the integrated scenario achieved superior environmental performance, yielding a net reduction with significant benefits in human health (-0.027 DALY) and resource conservation (-14.44 USD2013). Notably, it outperformed standalone systems in fifteen of the eighteen impact categories, with pronounced advantages in global warming potential, ecotoxicity, and fossil resource scarcity. However, the integrated system exhibited relative limitations in water consumption, terrestrial acidification, and ozone depletion. Sensitivity analysis revealed that a 10 % reduction in electricity consumption shifted the ecosystem impact of the integrated system from a burden (6.57 ×10 −5 species·yr) to a net benefit (-2.3 ×10 −5 species·yr). This study addresses the identified research gap by providing a systematic environmental assessment, underscoring the importance of adopting integrated rural organic solid waste management strategies tailored to regional conditions in China. • Rural organic solid wastes (ROSW) management has faced significant challenges. • Three scenarios for ROSW managements were evaluated based on life cycle assessment. • Integration of anaerobic digestion and aerobic composting (AD-AC) was promising. • AD-AC scenario maximized resource recovery and achieved reduction in GHG emissions. • Sensitivity analysis highlighted importance of reducing electricity consumption.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental Technology & Innovation
Published
2025-09-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eti.2025.104487
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Municipal Solid Waste Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.99
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Life cycle assessment of the integrating system of anaerobic digestion and aerobic composting for treating rural organic solid waste

Hao Peng, Zhanjun Cheng, Lan Mu, Hong Su et al.
2 citations
Environmental Technology & Innovation
Municipal Solid Waste Management
1.99
article

Life cycle assessment of the integrating system of anaerobic digestion and aerobic composting for treating rural organic solid waste

Hao Peng, Zhanjun Cheng, Lan Mu, Hong Su, Guanyi Chen, Rundong Li, Yingjin Song
article en
2 citations

Abstract

With the rapid development of modern society and the continuous increase in resource consumption in rural areas of China, the management of rural organic solid wastes has encountered substantial environmental and economic challenges. Although the integration of anaerobic digestion and aerobic composting offers promising potential for sustainable rural organic solid waste management, comprehensive environmental evaluations of this integrated system remain limited, representing a critical research gap. This study employed life cycle assessment to compare the integrated system with standalone anaerobic digestion and aerobic composting scenarios, assessing eighteen mid-point impact categories and three end-point indicators (human health, ecosystems, and resources). The results demonstrated that the integrated scenario achieved superior environmental performance, yielding a net reduction with significant benefits in human health (-0.027 DALY) and resource conservation (-14.44 USD2013). Notably, it outperformed standalone systems in fifteen of the eighteen impact categories, with pronounced advantages in global warming potential, ecotoxicity, and fossil resource scarcity. However, the integrated system exhibited relative limitations in water consumption, terrestrial acidification, and ozone depletion. Sensitivity analysis revealed that a 10 % reduction in electricity consumption shifted the ecosystem impact of the integrated system from a burden (6.57 ×10 −5 species·yr) to a net benefit (-2.3 ×10 −5 species·yr). This study addresses the identified research gap by providing a systematic environmental assessment, underscoring the importance of adopting integrated rural organic solid waste management strategies tailored to regional conditions in China. • Rural organic solid wastes (ROSW) management has faced significant challenges. • Three scenarios for ROSW managements were evaluated based on life cycle assessment. • Integration of anaerobic digestion and aerobic composting (AD-AC) was promising. • AD-AC scenario maximized resource recovery and achieved reduction in GHG emissions. • Sensitivity analysis highlighted importance of reducing electricity consumption.

Environmental Technology & InnovationVol. 40
Tianjin University of Commerce (CN), Shenyang Aerospace University (CN), Tianjin University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Municipal Solid Waste Management
1.99
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.