Where students struggle: Using data to uncover bottleneck in chemistry literacy

Understanding students' struggles in learning chemistry requires a multidimensional perspective that considers not only content mastery but also application, reasoning, and affective factors. This study aimed to identify bottlenecks in students' chemical literacy by analyzing performance across four key dimensions: content knowledge, contextual application, higher-order thinking skills (HOTS), and affective aspects (motivation and attitudes). Using a data-driven quantitative approach, assessment scores on electrochemistry topics were examined through advanced educational visualisations. Findings reveal that while students demonstrated strong performance in HOTS and moderate understanding of content, their ability to apply concepts in real-life contexts was limited. The most significant bottleneck emerged in the affective domain, where low scores were consistent and widespread. Correlation analysis further indicated weak relationships between dimensions, particularly the contextual aspect, which appeared conceptually independent. Visual tools such as Sankey diagrams highlighted progressive performance decline from content to affective domains. These results suggest that affective factors play a critical role in learning outcomes and require targeted intervention. The study underscores the importance of integrating data science in educational analysis to capture nuanced learning patterns and guide personalized instructional strategies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Science Talks
Published
2025-09-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sctalk.2025.100484
Primary Topic
Science Education and Pedagogy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Where students struggle: Using data to uncover bottleneck in chemistry literacy

Woro Sumarni, Sri Kadarwati Harjono, Dimas Gilang Ramadhani, Sri Susilogati Sumarti et al.
Science Talks
Science Education and Pedagogy
article

Where students struggle: Using data to uncover bottleneck in chemistry literacy

Woro Sumarni, Sri Kadarwati Harjono, Dimas Gilang Ramadhani, Sri Susilogati Sumarti, Endah Fitriani Rahayu, Maulidia Fara Fiadillah
article en

Abstract

Understanding students' struggles in learning chemistry requires a multidimensional perspective that considers not only content mastery but also application, reasoning, and affective factors. This study aimed to identify bottlenecks in students' chemical literacy by analyzing performance across four key dimensions: content knowledge, contextual application, higher-order thinking skills (HOTS), and affective aspects (motivation and attitudes). Using a data-driven quantitative approach, assessment scores on electrochemistry topics were examined through advanced educational visualisations. Findings reveal that while students demonstrated strong performance in HOTS and moderate understanding of content, their ability to apply concepts in real-life contexts was limited. The most significant bottleneck emerged in the affective domain, where low scores were consistent and widespread. Correlation analysis further indicated weak relationships between dimensions, particularly the contextual aspect, which appeared conceptually independent. Visual tools such as Sankey diagrams highlighted progressive performance decline from content to affective domains. These results suggest that affective factors play a critical role in learning outcomes and require targeted intervention. The study underscores the importance of integrating data science in educational analysis to capture nuanced learning patterns and guide personalized instructional strategies.

Science TalksVol. 16
State University of Semarang (ID)
Universitas Negeri Semarang
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Science Education and Pedagogy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.