Radiation dose and shielding considerations for digital dynamic radiography (DDR) compared to mobile C‐arms

DDR systems provide portable dynamic imaging capabilities but deliver substantially higher radiation output than conventional mobile C-arms. In addition, scatter dose rates from DDR were approximately 1.5-3 times higher than those from a conventional mobile C-arm under comparable conditions. This elevated dose, driven by high tube currents and long pulse durations, raises important safety concerns for patients, personnel, and shielding infrastructure. While DDR offers potential clinical value in motion-sensitive applications, its safe integration into practice requires careful protocol selection, attention to scatter exposure, and thoughtful shielding planning of exam rooms where the system will be used. As DDR systems become more prevalent and approach fluoroscopic performance, regulatory and design guidance may need to evolve to reflect their unique operational profile.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics
Published
2025-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/acm2.70256
Primary Topic
Radiation Dose and Imaging
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Radiation dose and shielding considerations for digital dynamic radiography (DDR) compared to mobile C‐arms

Jie Zhang, Azmul Siddique, Gary Ge
Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics
Radiation Dose and Imaging
article

Radiation dose and shielding considerations for digital dynamic radiography (DDR) compared to mobile C‐arms

Jie Zhang, Azmul Siddique, Gary Ge
article en

Abstract

DDR systems provide portable dynamic imaging capabilities but deliver substantially higher radiation output than conventional mobile C-arms. In addition, scatter dose rates from DDR were approximately 1.5-3 times higher than those from a conventional mobile C-arm under comparable conditions. This elevated dose, driven by high tube currents and long pulse durations, raises important safety concerns for patients, personnel, and shielding infrastructure. While DDR offers potential clinical value in motion-sensitive applications, its safe integration into practice requires careful protocol selection, attention to scatter exposure, and thoughtful shielding planning of exam rooms where the system will be used. As DDR systems become more prevalent and approach fluoroscopic performance, regulatory and design guidance may need to evolve to reflect their unique operational profile.

Journal of Applied Clinical Medical PhysicsVol. 26(9)
University of Kentucky (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Radiation Dose and Imaging
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.