Issues and suggestions regarding the ‘language f orms for communication’ in the 2 022 r evised n ational English curriculum

This study critically examines the categorization and school-level sequencing of ‘language forms for communication’ in the 2022 revised National English Curriculum of Korea. Although the curriculum aims to promote communicative competence, the analysis reveals persistent issues rooted in form-based classifications, misalignment with international standards such as the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages (CEFR), and insufficient consideration of the developmental and functional complexities of language forms. First, many grammatical categories are grouped by superficial similarities rather than communicative functions, weakening their educational coherence and leading to inconsistencies compared to international models. Second, the timing for introducing specific language forms at each school level often lacks alignment with both vocabulary difficulty and learners’ developmental stages, sometimes resulting in increased cognitive load and reduced focus on form. Third, a structural focus on complexity, rather than communicative utility or meaning, restricts early exposure to essential expressions and may impede learners’ linguistic and cognitive development. The paper argues that for the curriculum to fulfill its communicative objectives, it is imperative to adopt functionally grounded classifications, ensure developmental sequencing consistent with international standards, and consider the communicative and cognitive needs of learners. These reforms will enhance both the internal coherence of the curriculum and its effectiveness in fostering actual communicative competence.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Secondary English Education
Published
2025-08-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.20487/kasee.18.4.202508.101
Primary Topic
EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Issues and suggestions regarding the ‘language f orms for communication’ in the 2 022 r evised n ational English curriculum

Chae Kwan Jung, Jeong-eun Kim, Seon-bin Lee
Secondary English Education
EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
article

Issues and suggestions regarding the ‘language f orms for communication’ in the 2 022 r evised n ational English curriculum

Chae Kwan Jung, Jeong-eun Kim, Seon-bin Lee
article en

Abstract

This study critically examines the categorization and school-level sequencing of ‘language forms for communication’ in the 2022 revised National English Curriculum of Korea. Although the curriculum aims to promote communicative competence, the analysis reveals persistent issues rooted in form-based classifications, misalignment with international standards such as the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages (CEFR), and insufficient consideration of the developmental and functional complexities of language forms. First, many grammatical categories are grouped by superficial similarities rather than communicative functions, weakening their educational coherence and leading to inconsistencies compared to international models. Second, the timing for introducing specific language forms at each school level often lacks alignment with both vocabulary difficulty and learners’ developmental stages, sometimes resulting in increased cognitive load and reduced focus on form. Third, a structural focus on complexity, rather than communicative utility or meaning, restricts early exposure to essential expressions and may impede learners’ linguistic and cognitive development. The paper argues that for the curriculum to fulfill its communicative objectives, it is imperative to adopt functionally grounded classifications, ensure developmental sequencing consistent with international standards, and consider the communicative and cognitive needs of learners. These reforms will enhance both the internal coherence of the curriculum and its effectiveness in fostering actual communicative competence.

Secondary English EducationVol. 18(4)
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.