FRAMEWORK KARANGTURI UNTUK PROMPT ENGINEERING: ANALISIS KOMPARATIF DENGAN RTF, COT, DAN REACT PADA MODEL AI GENERATIF

This study aims to perform a comparative analysis of four prompt engineering frameworks: KARANGTURI, RTF (Role-Task-Format), CoT (Chain-of-Thought), and ReAct. These frameworks play a crucial role in assisting users in designing effective instructions for Large Language Models (LLMs). A descriptive-comparative approach is employed to examine each framework in terms of structure, focus, complexity, strengths, limitations, and practical application. KARANGTURI, a locally developed framework, consists of four key elements: Character, Summary, Goal, and Constraint. RTF offers a simple structure based on three core components, making it suitable for straightforward tasks. CoT emphasizes step-by-step reasoning and is effective for complex and logical challenges. ReAct integrates reasoning with actions and supports interaction with external tools for advanced tasks. The analysis reveals that the choice of framework depends on task type, complexity level, and the need for reasoning or access to external information. KARANGTURI is viewed as a comprehensive and flexible approach with promising potential, though it requires further empirical validation. The findings are expected to help AI practitioners select the most appropriate prompting strategy based on their specific needs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Science Technology and Management Journal
Published
2025-08-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.53416/stmj.v5i2.353
Primary Topic
Management and Optimization Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

FRAMEWORK KARANGTURI UNTUK PROMPT ENGINEERING: ANALISIS KOMPARATIF DENGAN RTF, COT, DAN REACT PADA MODEL AI GENERATIF

Hermawan Honggo
Science Technology and Management Journal
Management and Optimization Techniques
article

FRAMEWORK KARANGTURI UNTUK PROMPT ENGINEERING: ANALISIS KOMPARATIF DENGAN RTF, COT, DAN REACT PADA MODEL AI GENERATIF

Hermawan Honggo
article en

Abstract

This study aims to perform a comparative analysis of four prompt engineering frameworks: KARANGTURI, RTF (Role-Task-Format), CoT (Chain-of-Thought), and ReAct. These frameworks play a crucial role in assisting users in designing effective instructions for Large Language Models (LLMs). A descriptive-comparative approach is employed to examine each framework in terms of structure, focus, complexity, strengths, limitations, and practical application. KARANGTURI, a locally developed framework, consists of four key elements: Character, Summary, Goal, and Constraint. RTF offers a simple structure based on three core components, making it suitable for straightforward tasks. CoT emphasizes step-by-step reasoning and is effective for complex and logical challenges. ReAct integrates reasoning with actions and supports interaction with external tools for advanced tasks. The analysis reveals that the choice of framework depends on task type, complexity level, and the need for reasoning or access to external information. KARANGTURI is viewed as a comprehensive and flexible approach with promising potential, though it requires further empirical validation. The findings are expected to help AI practitioners select the most appropriate prompting strategy based on their specific needs.

Science Technology and Management JournalVol. 5(2)
Binus University (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Management and Optimization Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

FRAMEWORK KARANGTURI UNTUK PROMPT ENGINEERING: ANALISIS KOMPARATIF DENGAN RTF, COT, DAN REACT PADA MODEL AI GENERATIF — Hermawan Honggo · Science Technology and Management Journal (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS