Minimal oscillation and vanishing of smooth functions

Abstract In his paper [2], Ricceri considers, for X bounded convex subset of the real Hilbert space $ H,$ the quantity $$ \begin{align*}\delta_X = \inf_{\varphi\in \Gamma_X} \Big( \sup_{x\in X} \big(\kern-1.2pt\left\Vert x\right\Vert{}^2 +\varphi(x)\big) - \inf_{x\in X} \big(\kern-1.2pt\left\Vert x\right\Vert{}^2 +\varphi(x) \Big),\end{align*} $$ where $ \Gamma _X$ denotes the set of real convex functions on X , and shows that $\delta _X>0$ for $ X$ non singleton without giving any quantitative estimation of this quantity. And he asks, whether $\delta _X$ can be controlled by a function of the diameter of $ X$ . In this article, we show that $\delta _X$ is exactly the square of the Chebyshev radius of $ X$ , hence is at least $\dfrac {\operatorname {\mathrm {{diam}}}(X)^2}4$ . We deduce from the main result of [2] a quantitative statement on the zeros of a $\mathcal C^1$ -operator on $ H$ with Lipschitz derivative, and show that this statement is optimal.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Canadian Mathematical Bulletin
Published
2025-09-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4153/s000843952510115x
Primary Topic
Advanced Mathematical Modeling in Engineering
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Minimal oscillation and vanishing of smooth functions

Jean Saint Raymond
Canadian Mathematical Bulletin
Advanced Mathematical Modeling in Engineering
article

Minimal oscillation and vanishing of smooth functions

Jean Saint Raymond
article en

Abstract

Abstract In his paper [2], Ricceri considers, for X bounded convex subset of the real Hilbert space $ H,$ the quantity $$ \begin{align*}\delta_X = \inf_{\varphi\in \Gamma_X} \Big( \sup_{x\in X} \big(\kern-1.2pt\left\Vert x\right\Vert{}^2 +\varphi(x)\big) - \inf_{x\in X} \big(\kern-1.2pt\left\Vert x\right\Vert{}^2 +\varphi(x) \Big),\end{align*} $$ where $ \Gamma _X$ denotes the set of real convex functions on X , and shows that $\delta _X>0$ for $ X$ non singleton without giving any quantitative estimation of this quantity. And he asks, whether $\delta _X$ can be controlled by a function of the diameter of $ X$ . In this article, we show that $\delta _X$ is exactly the square of the Chebyshev radius of $ X$ , hence is at least $\dfrac {\operatorname {\mathrm {{diam}}}(X)^2}4$ . We deduce from the main result of [2] a quantitative statement on the zeros of a $\mathcal C^1$ -operator on $ H$ with Lipschitz derivative, and show that this statement is optimal.

Canadian Mathematical BulletinVol. 69(1)
Université Paris Cité (FR), Sorbonne Université (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Advanced Mathematical Modeling in Engineering
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.