Audit Committee Characteristics and Inter‐Corporate Loans: Indian Evidence

ABSTRACT Inter‐corporate loans (ICLs) are significant issues in many developing countries, such as India, given the opportunities for wealth extraction from non‐controlling shareholders. ICLs have attracted significant attention from legislators and regulators in India as part of efforts to enhance corporate governance and financial reporting quality. Recent changes in law and regulation in India require greater scrutiny of ICLs by audit committees. Using an unbalanced panel of 6074 firm‐year observations from 2261 publicly listed Indian firms, we find that audit committee independence (busyness) is negatively (positively) associated with ICLs. The results have policy implications because Indian law and Indian stock exchange listing rules (a) do not require that audit committees of publicly listed companies be fully independent and (b) have very high thresholds for audit committee director busyness.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Auditing
Published
2025-09-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/ijau.70004
Primary Topic
Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Audit Committee Characteristics and Inter‐Corporate Loans: Indian Evidence

Bipin Kumar Dixit, Narendra Nath Kushwaha, K. Raghunandan
International Journal of Auditing
Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
article

Audit Committee Characteristics and Inter‐Corporate Loans: Indian Evidence

Bipin Kumar Dixit, Narendra Nath Kushwaha, K. Raghunandan
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Inter‐corporate loans (ICLs) are significant issues in many developing countries, such as India, given the opportunities for wealth extraction from non‐controlling shareholders. ICLs have attracted significant attention from legislators and regulators in India as part of efforts to enhance corporate governance and financial reporting quality. Recent changes in law and regulation in India require greater scrutiny of ICLs by audit committees. Using an unbalanced panel of 6074 firm‐year observations from 2261 publicly listed Indian firms, we find that audit committee independence (busyness) is negatively (positively) associated with ICLs. The results have policy implications because Indian law and Indian stock exchange listing rules (a) do not require that audit committees of publicly listed companies be fully independent and (b) have very high thresholds for audit committee director busyness.

International Journal of AuditingVol. 30(1)
Florida International University (US), Indian Institute of Management Tiruchirappalli (IN), Ahmedabad University (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Audit Committee Characteristics and Inter‐Corporate Loans: Indian Evidence — Bipin Kumar Dixit, Narendra Nath Kushwaha, et al. · International Journal of Auditing (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS