Claws and consequences: human–tiger conflict and community responses in Bardiya National Park, Nepal

Human–tiger conflict (HTC) is one of the rising issues of Bardiya National Park (BNP) and is receiving attention from conservation biologists. This study emphasizes the extent of human–tiger conflict in two municipalities, Thakurbaba and Madhuban, in the buffer zone of Bardiya National Park, Nepal. Primary and secondary information was collected to determine the socio-economic characteristics relevant to tiger conservation following a questionnaire survey of the community people. A semi-structured questionnaire was randomly administered to 438 households to generate information from the respondents, along with these people’s perceptions toward tigers and their interest in tiger conservation. The Likert scale was used to assess respondents’ attitudes, while a chi-square test of homogeneity and logistic regression analysis were employed to determine the best-fitting model and identify significant variables influencing perceptions toward tiger conservation. A total of 18 people were killed and 10 were injured by tigers between 2019 and 2023. The people’s perception of tigers and their conservation was significantly associated with socio-economic variables, including gender, ethnicity, economic status, and source of income. We found female, low-income, and Janajati respondents likely to have negative attitudes toward their conservation. The Likert scale responses revealed strong overall support for tiger conservation and perceived tourism benefits. In addition to the ever-growing human–tiger conflict, people are aware of tiger conservation and suggest that making net wire fences, providing improved sheds for cattle, and cattle insurance schemes help to minimize Livestock depredation events; effective training on wildlife monitoring and awareness programs could be among the best ways to mitigate conflicts between humans and tigers.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Conservation Science
Published
2025-09-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fcosc.2025.1623056
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.72
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Claws and consequences: human–tiger conflict and community responses in Bardiya National Park, Nepal

Naresh Subedi, Rabin Bahadur K.C., Umesh Paudel, Rabin Kadariya et al.
1 citations
Frontiers in Conservation Science
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
1.72
article

Claws and consequences: human–tiger conflict and community responses in Bardiya National Park, Nepal

Naresh Subedi, Rabin Bahadur K.C., Umesh Paudel, Rabin Kadariya, Prabina Shrestha
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Human–tiger conflict (HTC) is one of the rising issues of Bardiya National Park (BNP) and is receiving attention from conservation biologists. This study emphasizes the extent of human–tiger conflict in two municipalities, Thakurbaba and Madhuban, in the buffer zone of Bardiya National Park, Nepal. Primary and secondary information was collected to determine the socio-economic characteristics relevant to tiger conservation following a questionnaire survey of the community people. A semi-structured questionnaire was randomly administered to 438 households to generate information from the respondents, along with these people’s perceptions toward tigers and their interest in tiger conservation. The Likert scale was used to assess respondents’ attitudes, while a chi-square test of homogeneity and logistic regression analysis were employed to determine the best-fitting model and identify significant variables influencing perceptions toward tiger conservation. A total of 18 people were killed and 10 were injured by tigers between 2019 and 2023. The people’s perception of tigers and their conservation was significantly associated with socio-economic variables, including gender, ethnicity, economic status, and source of income. We found female, low-income, and Janajati respondents likely to have negative attitudes toward their conservation. The Likert scale responses revealed strong overall support for tiger conservation and perceived tourism benefits. In addition to the ever-growing human–tiger conflict, people are aware of tiger conservation and suggest that making net wire fences, providing improved sheds for cattle, and cattle insurance schemes help to minimize Livestock depredation events; effective training on wildlife monitoring and awareness programs could be among the best ways to mitigate conflicts between humans and tigers.

Frontiers in Conservation ScienceVol. 6
University of Inland Norway (NO), National Trust for Nature Conservation (NP)
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
1.72
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.