Numerical Study of EV Frame Performance in Side Pole Collision: ASTM A36 vs. AL-7075T6 Analysis

Electric vehicles are emerging as eco-friendly alternatives to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and combat global warming. The Indonesian government supports this transition through subsidies, infrastructure development, and regulations encouraging electric vehicle adoption. Automotive manufacturers are enhancing electric vehicle models with safer and more efficient technology. Ensuring the frame's durability during collisions is crucial for safety. Structural engineering plays a vital role, as material failure from operational loads or impacts can lead to significant losses. The large and heavy batteries in electric vehicles present challenges in designing frames that support loads while maintaining passenger safety. Side-pole crash testing is essential due to the limited crumple zones on vehicle sides. This study analyzed the performance of ASTM A36 and AL-7075T6 materials in a side-pole collision at 32 km/h speed using the Finite Element Analysis method. The results showed that both materials experienced almost the same deformation, 98.79 mm for ASTM A26 and 98.77 mm for AL-7075T6. It is, however, a large difference in the maximum stress, ASTM A36 at 4849.7 MPa, and AL-7075T6 at only 1699.9 MPa. This was shown that AL-7075T6 has a better impact resistance than ASTM A36, therefore increasing the safety of electric vehicle frames for side-pole collision conditions.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Jurnal Rekayasa Mesin
Published
2025-08-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.32497/jrm.v20i2.6438
Primary Topic
Automotive and Human Injury Biomechanics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Numerical Study of EV Frame Performance in Side Pole Collision: ASTM A36 vs. AL-7075T6 Analysis

Aldias Bahatmaka, Mansour Amin
Jurnal Rekayasa Mesin
Automotive and Human Injury Biomechanics
article

Numerical Study of EV Frame Performance in Side Pole Collision: ASTM A36 vs. AL-7075T6 Analysis

Aldias Bahatmaka, Mansour Amin
article en

Abstract

Electric vehicles are emerging as eco-friendly alternatives to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and combat global warming. The Indonesian government supports this transition through subsidies, infrastructure development, and regulations encouraging electric vehicle adoption. Automotive manufacturers are enhancing electric vehicle models with safer and more efficient technology. Ensuring the frame's durability during collisions is crucial for safety. Structural engineering plays a vital role, as material failure from operational loads or impacts can lead to significant losses. The large and heavy batteries in electric vehicles present challenges in designing frames that support loads while maintaining passenger safety. Side-pole crash testing is essential due to the limited crumple zones on vehicle sides. This study analyzed the performance of ASTM A36 and AL-7075T6 materials in a side-pole collision at 32 km/h speed using the Finite Element Analysis method. The results showed that both materials experienced almost the same deformation, 98.79 mm for ASTM A26 and 98.77 mm for AL-7075T6. It is, however, a large difference in the maximum stress, ASTM A36 at 4849.7 MPa, and AL-7075T6 at only 1699.9 MPa. This was shown that AL-7075T6 has a better impact resistance than ASTM A36, therefore increasing the safety of electric vehicle frames for side-pole collision conditions.

Jurnal Rekayasa MesinVol. 20(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Automotive and Human Injury Biomechanics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.