Robust multi-objective optimization framework for performance-based seismic design of steel frame with energy dissipation system

Modern seismic codes ensure life safety, but code-compliant buildings can still suffer significant economic losses from earthquake-induced damage, even during moderate events. Performance-Based Seismic Design (PBSD) has been developed to mitigate the impact of disproportionate financial losses. However, optimizing seismic retrofits involves complex trade-offs and requires explicit consideration of design robustness against uncertainties. This study introduces a novel Robust Multi-objective Optimization framework for Performance-Based Seismic Design (RMO-PBSD). This framework addresses the inherent conflict between three key objectives: economic efficiency, post-earthquake repair costs, and design robustness. Economic efficiency is quantified by the cost of fluid viscous dampers (FVDs), a common retrofit measure. Repair costs are estimated using the FEMA P-58 methodology, while robustness is quantified by the variability of structural response under seismic uncertainty. The core contribution lies in integrating these three metrics (FVD cost, repair cost, and a robustness measure) into an integrated optimization process using the Non-dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm II (NSGA-II). The framework’s applicability and effectiveness are demonstrated through a case study of a 4-story steel moment-resisting frame retrofitted with FVDs, modeled in OpenSees. Seismic demand uncertainty is rigorously quantified using a series of ground motion records. Optimization results reveal a clear Pareto front, generally showing that higher FVD costs lead to lower repair costs and more robust designs (i.e., less sensitive to ground motion variability), although the robustness measure displays a non-linear relationship with the cost metrics. By analyzing designs along the Pareto front, the framework facilitates informed decision-making, identifying optimal, cost-effective FVD configurations that significantly enhance seismic performance while explicitly managing performance variability. This work provides a practical tool for achieving resilient and economically efficient seismic retrofits.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Built Environment
Published
2025-09-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fbuil.2025.1617542
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Probabilistic and Robust Engineering Design
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.40
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Robust multi-objective optimization framework for performance-based seismic design of steel frame with energy dissipation system

Weichiang Pang, Qiushi Chen, Yu‐Ting Cheng
1 citations
Frontiers in Built Environment
Probabilistic and Robust Engineering Design
1.40
article

Robust multi-objective optimization framework for performance-based seismic design of steel frame with energy dissipation system

Weichiang Pang, Qiushi Chen, Yu‐Ting Cheng
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Modern seismic codes ensure life safety, but code-compliant buildings can still suffer significant economic losses from earthquake-induced damage, even during moderate events. Performance-Based Seismic Design (PBSD) has been developed to mitigate the impact of disproportionate financial losses. However, optimizing seismic retrofits involves complex trade-offs and requires explicit consideration of design robustness against uncertainties. This study introduces a novel Robust Multi-objective Optimization framework for Performance-Based Seismic Design (RMO-PBSD). This framework addresses the inherent conflict between three key objectives: economic efficiency, post-earthquake repair costs, and design robustness. Economic efficiency is quantified by the cost of fluid viscous dampers (FVDs), a common retrofit measure. Repair costs are estimated using the FEMA P-58 methodology, while robustness is quantified by the variability of structural response under seismic uncertainty. The core contribution lies in integrating these three metrics (FVD cost, repair cost, and a robustness measure) into an integrated optimization process using the Non-dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm II (NSGA-II). The framework’s applicability and effectiveness are demonstrated through a case study of a 4-story steel moment-resisting frame retrofitted with FVDs, modeled in OpenSees. Seismic demand uncertainty is rigorously quantified using a series of ground motion records. Optimization results reveal a clear Pareto front, generally showing that higher FVD costs lead to lower repair costs and more robust designs (i.e., less sensitive to ground motion variability), although the robustness measure displays a non-linear relationship with the cost metrics. By analyzing designs along the Pareto front, the framework facilitates informed decision-making, identifying optimal, cost-effective FVD configurations that significantly enhance seismic performance while explicitly managing performance variability. This work provides a practical tool for achieving resilient and economically efficient seismic retrofits.

Frontiers in Built EnvironmentVol. 11
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Probabilistic and Robust Engineering Design
1.40
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.