Comparison of Standard Setting Procedures to Establish Defensible Passing Standards for Clinical Skills Assessment: Angoff, Borderline Group, Contrasting Groups and Patient Safety Methods
The Patient Safety method required a higher performance level for items related to safety, aligned with expert judges' conceptualisation of competence. Therefore, the Patient Safety method demonstrated the best match for this assessment's goals. These findings can inform method selection for clinical skills where patient safety is a key consideration. Additional recommendations are to include pass rate feasibility and conceptual alignment with the target construct when selecting standard setting methods.
Authors
- Rachel S Tappan (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5337-9948)
- Heidi Roth (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2013-5936)
- Yoon Soo Park (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8583-4335)
- Elizabeth E. Holland (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4675-9739)
- Megan L. Freeland
Institutions
- Northwestern University (US)
- Illinois College (US)
- University of Illinois Chicago (US)
- University of Chicago Medical Center (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- The Clinical Teacher
- Published
- 2025-09-03
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1111/tct.70198
- Primary Topic
- Innovations in Medical Education
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00
Funders
- Northwestern University
- Feinberg School of Medicine