Technical system of electroencephalography-based brain-computer interface: Advances, applications, and challenges

Electroencephalography-based brain-computer interfaces have revolutionized the integration of neural signals with technological systems, offering transformative solutions across neuroscience, biomedical engineering, and clinical practice. This review systematically analyzes advancements in electroencephalography-based brain-computer interface architectures, emphasizing four pillars, namely signal acquisition, paradigm design, decoding algorithms, and diverse applications. The aim is to bridge the gap between technology and application and guide future research. In signal acquisition, noninvasive systems using wet, dry, and semi-dry electrodes are more comfortable and gentler on the skin compared to traditional methods. However, ensuring stable signal quality over long periods of time remains a challenge. Minimally invasive approaches, such as microneedle arrays and endovascular probes, achieve near-invasive signal fidelity without major surgery. Paradigm design explores task-specific neural encoders. Although motor imagery paradigms are widely used in rehabilitation, they require weeks of user training. Steady-state visually evoked potential and P300 speller paradigms enable rapid calibration, but cause visual and cognitive fatigue. Advanced systems currently combine electroencephalography with electromyography or eye-tracking to better handle real-world tasks. Decoding algorithms have advanced through Riemannian geometry for improved noise filtering, deep learning architectures for automated spatiotemporal feature extraction, and transfer learning frameworks to minimize cross-subject calibration. However, challenges remain in managing inconsistent electroencephalography, reducing processing demands, and ensuring compatibility across different electroencephalography devices. Clinical trials reveal a predominant focus on stroke rehabilitation, while emerging frontiers include astronaut neuromonitoring in space exploration. Challenges include improving signal accuracy, minimizing movement interference, addressing ethical data concerns, and ensuring real-world use. Future advancements focus on biocompatible nanomaterials, adaptive algorithms, and multimodal integration, positioning electroencephalography-based brain-computer interfaces as pivotal tools in next-generation neurotechnology.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Neural Regeneration Research
Published
2025-09-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4103/nrr.nrr-d-25-00217
Citations
1
Primary Topic
EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.43
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Technical system of electroencephalography-based brain-computer interface: Advances, applications, and challenges

Shuo Wang, Hui Yu, Jinglai Sun, Chong Liu et al.
1 citations
Neural Regeneration Research
EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
1.43
article

Technical system of electroencephalography-based brain-computer interface: Advances, applications, and challenges

Shuo Wang, Hui Yu, Jinglai Sun, Chong Liu, Qi Mu
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Electroencephalography-based brain-computer interfaces have revolutionized the integration of neural signals with technological systems, offering transformative solutions across neuroscience, biomedical engineering, and clinical practice. This review systematically analyzes advancements in electroencephalography-based brain-computer interface architectures, emphasizing four pillars, namely signal acquisition, paradigm design, decoding algorithms, and diverse applications. The aim is to bridge the gap between technology and application and guide future research. In signal acquisition, noninvasive systems using wet, dry, and semi-dry electrodes are more comfortable and gentler on the skin compared to traditional methods. However, ensuring stable signal quality over long periods of time remains a challenge. Minimally invasive approaches, such as microneedle arrays and endovascular probes, achieve near-invasive signal fidelity without major surgery. Paradigm design explores task-specific neural encoders. Although motor imagery paradigms are widely used in rehabilitation, they require weeks of user training. Steady-state visually evoked potential and P300 speller paradigms enable rapid calibration, but cause visual and cognitive fatigue. Advanced systems currently combine electroencephalography with electromyography or eye-tracking to better handle real-world tasks. Decoding algorithms have advanced through Riemannian geometry for improved noise filtering, deep learning architectures for automated spatiotemporal feature extraction, and transfer learning frameworks to minimize cross-subject calibration. However, challenges remain in managing inconsistent electroencephalography, reducing processing demands, and ensuring compatibility across different electroencephalography devices. Clinical trials reveal a predominant focus on stroke rehabilitation, while emerging frontiers include astronaut neuromonitoring in space exploration. Challenges include improving signal accuracy, minimizing movement interference, addressing ethical data concerns, and ensuring real-world use. Future advancements focus on biocompatible nanomaterials, adaptive algorithms, and multimodal integration, positioning electroencephalography-based brain-computer interfaces as pivotal tools in next-generation neurotechnology.

Neural Regeneration Research
Tianjin University (CN), Tiangong University (CN), Tianjin Fourth Hospital (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
1.43
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.