Follow-up Survey of Panel Attriters Investigating Reasons for Attrition and Willingness to Rejoin: The Case of the FReDA Panel

This study examined the feasibility of conducting a follow-up survey of panel attriters as a panel maintenance measure to investigate respondents’ reasons for attrition, assessing their willingness to rejoin, and updating their addresses. We surveyed FReDA panelists who had not participated in two consecutive subwaves and were excluded from the panel. The response rate for the follow-up survey was 7.1%. The most common reasons for non-participation in previous FReDA subwaves were time-related. Of the follow-up survey participants, 84.1% agreed to be re-contacted for the upcoming subwave. These respondents had promising participation rates of 67.4% and 53.8% in the two subsequent FReDA subwaves. Given the ease of conducting a follow-up survey online and its benefits in gaining valuable insights into the reasons for (temporary) attrition, re-engaging attriters, and updating their addresses, we consider it a valuable panel maintenance measure.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Field Methods
Published
2025-09-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822x251343721
Primary Topic
Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Follow-up Survey of Panel Attriters Investigating Reasons for Attrition and Willingness to Rejoin: The Case of the FReDA Panel

Tobias Gummer, Tanja Kunz, Simon Börlin
Field Methods
Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics
article

Follow-up Survey of Panel Attriters Investigating Reasons for Attrition and Willingness to Rejoin: The Case of the FReDA Panel

Tobias Gummer, Tanja Kunz, Simon Börlin
article en

Abstract

This study examined the feasibility of conducting a follow-up survey of panel attriters as a panel maintenance measure to investigate respondents’ reasons for attrition, assessing their willingness to rejoin, and updating their addresses. We surveyed FReDA panelists who had not participated in two consecutive subwaves and were excluded from the panel. The response rate for the follow-up survey was 7.1%. The most common reasons for non-participation in previous FReDA subwaves were time-related. Of the follow-up survey participants, 84.1% agreed to be re-contacted for the upcoming subwave. These respondents had promising participation rates of 67.4% and 53.8% in the two subsequent FReDA subwaves. Given the ease of conducting a follow-up survey online and its benefits in gaining valuable insights into the reasons for (temporary) attrition, re-engaging attriters, and updating their addresses, we consider it a valuable panel maintenance measure.

Field MethodsVol. 37(4)
University of Mannheim (DE), GESIS - Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.