A Study on the Punitive Antihero in “A Killer Paradox”: A Comparative Analysis of the Webtoon and Drama

This study analyzes the punitive anti-hero narrative, which punishes only criminals, focusing on the Naver Webtoon A Killer Paradox (2010) and its Netflix drama adaptation of the same title (2024). To this end, the study compares the murder cases involving the protagonist, Lee Tang, by categorizing them into the situational context, the internal rationale, and the manner of the killings, while also examining the changing perceptions and attitudes of the surrounding characters toward him. The analysis reveals that although both the webtoon and the drama depict the punitive anti-hero, their narrative strategies diverge significantly. Typically, the punitive anti-hero justifies personal crimes under the pretext of protecting citizens’ safety, which makes the “identification of criminals” an inevitable narrative issue. In the webtoon, Lee Tang is portrayed not as one who kills after identifying criminals deserving of death, but as a figure who reveals the victim’s culpability after the killing—thus subverting the causal logic of criminal identification. Conversely, the drama reconstructs Lee Tang as a more conventional anti-hero by endowing him with a transcendental ability to recognize criminals through bodily signs such as goosebumps. The responses of surrounding characters to Lee Tang also differ across media, providing insight into how anti-heroes are granted legitimacy within the community. In the webtoon, characters such as Noh Bin, Jang Nan-gam, and Song Chon undergo betrayal by paternal or paternal-like authority figures, which leads them to repudiate the social values once regarded as virtues. Encountering Lee Tang—who fills the void left by collapsed paternal authority and exposes justice as an illusion through logical leaps—they fall into confusion. In contrast, the drama depicts these characters as relatively stable, as their belief that justice can be achieved by upholding social virtues remains unshaken. Consequently, when faced with Lee Tang, who symbolizes an alternative to the existing order, they do not experience comparable disorientation. Through this analysis, the study demonstrates that while the webtoon presents the anti-hero as a figure that dismantles boundaries and raises the fundamental question of “what is justice,” the drama emphasizes a conventional anti-hero model that ultimately reduces conflicts to a justice firmly bound to ethics. By identifying these two distinct modes of the punitive anti-hero, the study suggests the potential for exploring the conditions under which different anti-hero models become valid across media.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Academic Association of Global Cultural Contents
Published
2025-08-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.32611/jgcc.2025.8.64.71
Primary Topic
Asian Culture and Media Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Study on the Punitive Antihero in “A Killer Paradox”: A Comparative Analysis of the Webtoon and Drama

Myeoung-Hyun Lee, Kyu-Yeon Kim
Academic Association of Global Cultural Contents
Asian Culture and Media Studies
article

A Study on the Punitive Antihero in “A Killer Paradox”: A Comparative Analysis of the Webtoon and Drama

Myeoung-Hyun Lee, Kyu-Yeon Kim
article en

Abstract

This study analyzes the punitive anti-hero narrative, which punishes only criminals, focusing on the Naver Webtoon A Killer Paradox (2010) and its Netflix drama adaptation of the same title (2024). To this end, the study compares the murder cases involving the protagonist, Lee Tang, by categorizing them into the situational context, the internal rationale, and the manner of the killings, while also examining the changing perceptions and attitudes of the surrounding characters toward him. The analysis reveals that although both the webtoon and the drama depict the punitive anti-hero, their narrative strategies diverge significantly. Typically, the punitive anti-hero justifies personal crimes under the pretext of protecting citizens’ safety, which makes the “identification of criminals” an inevitable narrative issue. In the webtoon, Lee Tang is portrayed not as one who kills after identifying criminals deserving of death, but as a figure who reveals the victim’s culpability after the killing—thus subverting the causal logic of criminal identification. Conversely, the drama reconstructs Lee Tang as a more conventional anti-hero by endowing him with a transcendental ability to recognize criminals through bodily signs such as goosebumps. The responses of surrounding characters to Lee Tang also differ across media, providing insight into how anti-heroes are granted legitimacy within the community. In the webtoon, characters such as Noh Bin, Jang Nan-gam, and Song Chon undergo betrayal by paternal or paternal-like authority figures, which leads them to repudiate the social values once regarded as virtues. Encountering Lee Tang—who fills the void left by collapsed paternal authority and exposes justice as an illusion through logical leaps—they fall into confusion. In contrast, the drama depicts these characters as relatively stable, as their belief that justice can be achieved by upholding social virtues remains unshaken. Consequently, when faced with Lee Tang, who symbolizes an alternative to the existing order, they do not experience comparable disorientation. Through this analysis, the study demonstrates that while the webtoon presents the anti-hero as a figure that dismantles boundaries and raises the fundamental question of “what is justice,” the drama emphasizes a conventional anti-hero model that ultimately reduces conflicts to a justice firmly bound to ethics. By identifying these two distinct modes of the punitive anti-hero, the study suggests the potential for exploring the conditions under which different anti-hero models become valid across media.

Academic Association of Global Cultural ContentsVol. 64
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Asian Culture and Media Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.