10.47363/JAHL/

Since the Taliban’s returned to power in 2021, Afghanistan faced widespread international isolation and a severe shortage of development aid. This study assessed how the geopolitical context of international aid affected Afghanistan’s achievement of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). The need for this study arose because no scholarly analysis had previously examined the relationship between political conditions of aid, regional rivalries, and Afghan needs. The study relied on interviews with 20 university lecturers and a thematic analysis of documents. The main finding showed that international aid, which had previously focused on long-term development, became limited to addressing short-term humanitarian needs. Aid was made conditional on values such as women’s rights, inclusive governance, and freedom of expression principles that conflicted with the Taliban regime’s policies. These conditions hindered long-term development, with particular attention to SDGs 4, 5, 8, 9, and 16. Similarly, USA, China, Pakistan, and Qatar used aid for political influence, not to meet the needs of the Afghan people. This study concluded that effective aid required transparency, local ownership, and a needs-based approach rather than political conditions. It recommended that international donors adopt a neutral, needs-driven strategy that supported sustainable development without intensifying domestic political tensions.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Arts Humanities and Linguistics
Published
2025-09-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.47363/jahl/2025(1)107
Primary Topic
Politics and Conflicts in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Middle East
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

10.47363/JAHL/

Imranullah Akhtar, Noorullah Noori Mojaddadi, Zabihullah Shinwari
Journal of Arts Humanities and Linguistics
Politics and Conflicts in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Middle East
article

10.47363/JAHL/

Imranullah Akhtar, Noorullah Noori Mojaddadi, Zabihullah Shinwari
article en

Abstract

Since the Taliban’s returned to power in 2021, Afghanistan faced widespread international isolation and a severe shortage of development aid. This study assessed how the geopolitical context of international aid affected Afghanistan’s achievement of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). The need for this study arose because no scholarly analysis had previously examined the relationship between political conditions of aid, regional rivalries, and Afghan needs. The study relied on interviews with 20 university lecturers and a thematic analysis of documents. The main finding showed that international aid, which had previously focused on long-term development, became limited to addressing short-term humanitarian needs. Aid was made conditional on values such as women’s rights, inclusive governance, and freedom of expression principles that conflicted with the Taliban regime’s policies. These conditions hindered long-term development, with particular attention to SDGs 4, 5, 8, 9, and 16. Similarly, USA, China, Pakistan, and Qatar used aid for political influence, not to meet the needs of the Afghan people. This study concluded that effective aid required transparency, local ownership, and a needs-based approach rather than political conditions. It recommended that international donors adopt a neutral, needs-driven strategy that supported sustainable development without intensifying domestic political tensions.

Journal of Arts Humanities and Linguistics
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Politics and Conflicts in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Middle East
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.