A Correcting Factor for the Reduction of Body Length and Mass of European Eel After Ethanol Preservation and After Freezing

ABSTRACT Measurements of length and mass are used in many research fields, and such data are often collected from samples that have been preserved in ethanol or frozen prior to data collection. Since many preservation methods affect the size and shape of soft‐bodied animals, species‐specific correction factors are used. Here, we calculated ethanol and freezing shrinkage correction factors for the European eel, Anguilla anguilla Linnaeus, 1758, and investigated how preservation duration and individual size affected shrinkage. We also investigated if freezing had an impact on the size of the eyes and pectoral fins, which could affect maturation stage classification. We found that preservation in 95% ethanol and freezing decreased body length and mass, as expected. Time kept in ethanol did not affect shrinkage. Time kept in freezer had some effect on shrinkage, and the model fit suggested inclusion of days frozen for body mass shrinkage. That, however, only had negligible improvement on the model. For preservation in freezer, shrinkage was greater for lengths below 330 mm and mass below 100 g, compared to eels above these sizes. However, applying a size threshold to the analysis only generated negligible improvement of the model fit, meaning that specific shrinkage factors for different sizes are not needed. We also found that freezing induced shrinking in eye size, while the pectoral fin increased in size. The increase in pectoral fin length is however believed to be due to a measurement deviation. User‐friendly formulas for all correction factors are provided. The application of these factors should be restricted to the European eel within the size range used in this paper.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Aquaculture Fish and Fisheries
Published
2025-09-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/aff2.70094
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Meat and Animal Product Quality
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.19

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Correcting Factor for the Reduction of Body Length and Mass of European Eel After Ethanol Preservation and After Freezing

John Persson, Stefan Skoglund, Josefin Sundin
1 citations
Aquaculture Fish and Fisheries
Meat and Animal Product Quality
1.19
article

A Correcting Factor for the Reduction of Body Length and Mass of European Eel After Ethanol Preservation and After Freezing

John Persson, Stefan Skoglund, Josefin Sundin
article en
1 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Measurements of length and mass are used in many research fields, and such data are often collected from samples that have been preserved in ethanol or frozen prior to data collection. Since many preservation methods affect the size and shape of soft‐bodied animals, species‐specific correction factors are used. Here, we calculated ethanol and freezing shrinkage correction factors for the European eel, Anguilla anguilla Linnaeus, 1758, and investigated how preservation duration and individual size affected shrinkage. We also investigated if freezing had an impact on the size of the eyes and pectoral fins, which could affect maturation stage classification. We found that preservation in 95% ethanol and freezing decreased body length and mass, as expected. Time kept in ethanol did not affect shrinkage. Time kept in freezer had some effect on shrinkage, and the model fit suggested inclusion of days frozen for body mass shrinkage. That, however, only had negligible improvement on the model. For preservation in freezer, shrinkage was greater for lengths below 330 mm and mass below 100 g, compared to eels above these sizes. However, applying a size threshold to the analysis only generated negligible improvement of the model fit, meaning that specific shrinkage factors for different sizes are not needed. We also found that freezing induced shrinking in eye size, while the pectoral fin increased in size. The increase in pectoral fin length is however believed to be due to a measurement deviation. User‐friendly formulas for all correction factors are provided. The application of these factors should be restricted to the European eel within the size range used in this paper.

Aquaculture Fish and FisheriesVol. 5(5)
Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SE)
European Commission, Sveriges Lantbruksuniversitet
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Meat and Animal Product Quality
1.19
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.