Monitoring earth’s glacial lakes from space with machine learning

The rapid worldwide formation and expansion of glacial lakes has increased the likelihood of glacial lake outburst floods, threatening lives and infrastructure, particularly in vulnerable mountain communities. Given the rapid increase in the popularity of artificial intelligence methods for remote sensing of glacial lakes, a comprehensive review is essential. We survey a decade (2015–2024) of research on glacial lake monitoring from space, with a focus on classical machine learning and deep learning approaches. We identify key trends, research gaps, and best practices for future studies. Most studies rely on optical imagery, especially Landsat-8 and Sentinel-2, while Sentinel-1 serves as a complementary radar source. However, monitoring glacial lakes in mountainous regions remains a challenge on cloudy days due to the limitations of radar and the unusability of optical data. Deep learning, particularly U-Net and DeepLab derivatives, dominates learning-based glacial lake studies but remains computationally demanding. Critical challenges involve balancing performance gains against trade-offs in data availability, computational cost, and model transferability. Geographic and methodological gaps, especially in regions experiencing rapid lake growth, underscore the need for broader spatial coverage and improved spatiotemporal model generalization. Moreover, transitioning from a focus on static seasonal mapping to frequent multi-temporal monitoring is beneficial for understanding glacial lake evolution and outburst flood hazards. Adapting emerging deep learning architectures to integrate multispectral, hyperspectral, and radar data could enhance glacial lake detection capabilities. Furthermore, thorough inter-method comparisons, benchmarking with rigorous evaluation metrics, and open-sourcing datasets and code would facilitate robust, large-scale glacial lake monitoring efforts. • Key regions with hazardous glacial lakes are understudied with learning-based methods. • U-Net and DeepLab dominate learning-based studies, but compute costs pose a barrier. • Emphasis on transferability assessments is needed to validate model generalization. • Fair benchmarking with strict evaluation metrics is crucial yet often overlooked.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Science of Remote Sensing
Published
2025-09-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.srs.2025.100277
Primary Topic
Cryospheric studies and observations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Monitoring earth’s glacial lakes from space with machine learning

Manu Tom, Holger Frey, Jeffrey Wade, Daniel Odermatt et al.
Science of Remote Sensing
Cryospheric studies and observations
article

Monitoring earth’s glacial lakes from space with machine learning

Manu Tom, Holger Frey, Jeffrey Wade, Daniel Odermatt, Arnaud Cerbelaud, Cédric Hervé David
article en

Abstract

The rapid worldwide formation and expansion of glacial lakes has increased the likelihood of glacial lake outburst floods, threatening lives and infrastructure, particularly in vulnerable mountain communities. Given the rapid increase in the popularity of artificial intelligence methods for remote sensing of glacial lakes, a comprehensive review is essential. We survey a decade (2015–2024) of research on glacial lake monitoring from space, with a focus on classical machine learning and deep learning approaches. We identify key trends, research gaps, and best practices for future studies. Most studies rely on optical imagery, especially Landsat-8 and Sentinel-2, while Sentinel-1 serves as a complementary radar source. However, monitoring glacial lakes in mountainous regions remains a challenge on cloudy days due to the limitations of radar and the unusability of optical data. Deep learning, particularly U-Net and DeepLab derivatives, dominates learning-based glacial lake studies but remains computationally demanding. Critical challenges involve balancing performance gains against trade-offs in data availability, computational cost, and model transferability. Geographic and methodological gaps, especially in regions experiencing rapid lake growth, underscore the need for broader spatial coverage and improved spatiotemporal model generalization. Moreover, transitioning from a focus on static seasonal mapping to frequent multi-temporal monitoring is beneficial for understanding glacial lake evolution and outburst flood hazards. Adapting emerging deep learning architectures to integrate multispectral, hyperspectral, and radar data could enhance glacial lake detection capabilities. Furthermore, thorough inter-method comparisons, benchmarking with rigorous evaluation metrics, and open-sourcing datasets and code would facilitate robust, large-scale glacial lake monitoring efforts. • Key regions with hazardous glacial lakes are understudied with learning-based methods. • U-Net and DeepLab dominate learning-based studies, but compute costs pose a barrier. • Emphasis on transferability assessments is needed to validate model generalization. • Fair benchmarking with strict evaluation metrics is crucial yet often overlooked.

Science of Remote SensingVol. 12
Jet Propulsion Laboratory (US), University of Zurich (CH), Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology (CH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Cryospheric studies and observations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.