Comparison of Auditory Brainstem Evoked Responses between Migraine Patients and Healthy Controls: A Cross-sectional Study

Introduction: Migraine is a complex neurological disorder associated with noise hypersensitivity most evident during attacks (ictal), however persistent during the post-attack (interictal) period as well. Previous studies on cortical auditory potentials have established abnormal sensory processing during the interictal phase but findings related to subcortical (brainstem) involvement remain inconclusive. Aim: To compare Wave I and Wave V amplitude of Auditory Brainstem Evoked Responses (ABER) between migraineurs during the interictal phase and healthy controls at 40-, 50-, and 60-dB above Sensation Level (SL) for both ears. Materials and Methods: The present study was a crosssectional study conducted at the Department of Physiology, SMS Medical College, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India. Thirty-five diagnosed migraine patients during the interictal phase from the Neurology Outpatient Department (OPD) and 35 age and gender-matched healthy controls were enrolled. The Wave I and V amplitude (µV) were measured, at 40-, 50-, and 60-dB above SL bilaterally, in both groups. Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) software version 25 was used to analyse the results and an unpaired student’s t-test was employed for comparison in a side-specific manner. The significance level was assigned at a p-value <0.05. Results: The amplitudes of Wave V at 50-db SL (p-value: left ear=0.03, right ear=0.01) and 60-dB SL (p-value: left ear=0.005, right ear=0.013) were significantly higher among migraineurs during interictal phase than their matched controls. The amplitude difference for Wave I was statistically insignificant between the two groups at all recording intensities. At 40 dB SL, both Wave I (p-value: left ear=0.68, right ear=0.63) and Wave V (p-value: left ear=0.30, right ear=0.50) amplitudes did not exhibit any significant difference in results between migraine patients and healthy controls. Conclusion: The subcortical auditory dysfunction is significant for brainstem nuclei beyond the cochlear nucleus (peripheral auditory neurons) at higher intensities, indicating a more noticeable central processing disorder. This could eventually lead to irreversible auditory pathway damage, ABER can be utilised as a tool for early detection and localisation of the insult, providing an opportunity for early intervention and use of prophylactic measures.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH
Published
2025-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7860/jcdr/2025/76493.21487
Primary Topic
Noise Effects and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of Auditory Brainstem Evoked Responses between Migraine Patients and Healthy Controls: A Cross-sectional Study

Jyotsna Shukla, Abhishek Saini, Daniya Khalid, Rajni Fulwariya
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH
Noise Effects and Management
article

Comparison of Auditory Brainstem Evoked Responses between Migraine Patients and Healthy Controls: A Cross-sectional Study

Jyotsna Shukla, Abhishek Saini, Daniya Khalid, Rajni Fulwariya
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Migraine is a complex neurological disorder associated with noise hypersensitivity most evident during attacks (ictal), however persistent during the post-attack (interictal) period as well. Previous studies on cortical auditory potentials have established abnormal sensory processing during the interictal phase but findings related to subcortical (brainstem) involvement remain inconclusive. Aim: To compare Wave I and Wave V amplitude of Auditory Brainstem Evoked Responses (ABER) between migraineurs during the interictal phase and healthy controls at 40-, 50-, and 60-dB above Sensation Level (SL) for both ears. Materials and Methods: The present study was a crosssectional study conducted at the Department of Physiology, SMS Medical College, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India. Thirty-five diagnosed migraine patients during the interictal phase from the Neurology Outpatient Department (OPD) and 35 age and gender-matched healthy controls were enrolled. The Wave I and V amplitude (µV) were measured, at 40-, 50-, and 60-dB above SL bilaterally, in both groups. Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) software version 25 was used to analyse the results and an unpaired student’s t-test was employed for comparison in a side-specific manner. The significance level was assigned at a p-value <0.05. Results: The amplitudes of Wave V at 50-db SL (p-value: left ear=0.03, right ear=0.01) and 60-dB SL (p-value: left ear=0.005, right ear=0.013) were significantly higher among migraineurs during interictal phase than their matched controls. The amplitude difference for Wave I was statistically insignificant between the two groups at all recording intensities. At 40 dB SL, both Wave I (p-value: left ear=0.68, right ear=0.63) and Wave V (p-value: left ear=0.30, right ear=0.50) amplitudes did not exhibit any significant difference in results between migraine patients and healthy controls. Conclusion: The subcortical auditory dysfunction is significant for brainstem nuclei beyond the cochlear nucleus (peripheral auditory neurons) at higher intensities, indicating a more noticeable central processing disorder. This could eventually lead to irreversible auditory pathway damage, ABER can be utilised as a tool for early detection and localisation of the insult, providing an opportunity for early intervention and use of prophylactic measures.

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Noise Effects and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.